第 28 节
作者:水王      更新:2022-05-01 22:41      字数:9322
  in conjunction with all the other complementary parts。 Everywhere
  and at all times we see navigation; inland and foreign trade; and
  even agriculture itself; flourish only where manufactures have
  reached a high state of prosperity。 But if freedom be an
  indispensable condition for the prosperity of navigation; how much
  wore must it be so for the prosperity of the manufacturing power;
  for the growth of the entire producing power of a nation? History
  contains no record of a rich; commercial; and industrial community
  that was not at the same time in the enjoyment of freedom。
  Manufactures everywhere first brought into operation improved
  weans of transport; improved river navigation; improved highways;
  steam navigation and railways; which constitute the fundamental
  elements of improved systems of agriculture and of civilisation。
  History teaches that arts and trades migrated from city to
  city; from one country to another。 Persecuted and oppressed at
  home; they took refuge in cities and in countries where freedom;
  protection; and support were assured to them。 In this way they
  migrated from Greece and Asia to Italy; from Italy to Germany;
  Flanders; and Brabant; and from thence to Holland and England。
  Everywhere it was want of sense and despotism that drove them away;
  and the spirit of freedom that attracted them。 But for the folly of
  the Continental governments; England would have had difficulty in
  attaining supremacy in industry。 But does it appear more consistent
  with wisdom for us in Germany to wait patiently until other nations
  are impolitic enough to drive out their industries and thus compel
  them to seek a refuge with us; or that we should; without waiting
  for such contingencies; invite them by proffered advantages to
  settle down amongst us?
  It is true that experience teaches that the wind bears the seed
  from one region to another; and that thus waste moorlands have been
  transformed into dense forests; but would it on that account be
  wise policy for the forester to wait until the wind in the course
  of ages effects this transformation?
  Is it unwise on his part if by sowing and planting he seeks to
  attain the same object within a few decades? History tells us that
  whole nations have successfully accomplished that which we see the
  forester do? Single free cities; or small republics and
  confederations of such cities and states; limited in territorial
  possessions; of small population and insignificant military power;
  but fortified by the energy of youthful freedom and favoured by
  geographical position as well as by fortunate circumstances and
  opportunities; flourished by means of manufactures and commerce
  long before the great monarchies; and by free commercial
  intercourse with the latter; by which they exported to them
  manufactured goods and imported raw produce in exchange; raised
  themselves to a high degree of wealth and power。 Thus did Venice;
  the Hanse Towns the Belgians and the Dutch。
  Nor was this system of free trade less profitable at first to
  the great monarchies themselves; with whom these smaller
  communities had commercial intercourse。 For; having regard to the
  wealth of their natural resources and to their undeveloped social
  condition the free importation of foreign manufactured goods and
  the exportation of native produce presented the surest and most
  effectual means of developing their own powers of production; of
  instilling habits of industry into their subjects who were addicted
  to idleness and turbulence; of inducing their landowners and nobles
  to feel an interest in industry; of arousing the dormant spirit of
  enterprise amongst their merchants; and especially of raising their
  own civilisation; industry; and power。
  These effects were learned generally by Great Britain from the
  trade and manufacturing industry of the Italians; the Hansards; the
  Belgians; and the Dutch。 But having attained to a certain grade of
  development by means of free trade; the great monarchies perceived
  that the highest degree of civilisation; power; and wealth can only
  be attained by a combination of manufactures and commerce with
  agriculture。 They perceived that their newly established native
  manufactures could never hope to succeed in free competition with
  the old and long established manufactures of foreigners; that their
  native fisheries and native mercantile marine; the foundations of
  their naval power; could never make successful progress without
  special privileges; and that the spirit of enterprise of their
  native merchants would always be kept down by the overwhelming
  reserves of capital; the greater experience and sagacity of the
  foreigners。 Hence they sought; by a system of restrictions;
  privileges; and encouragements; to transplant on to their native
  soil the wealth; the talents; and the spirit of enterprise of the
  foreigners。 This policy was pursued with greater or lesser; with
  speedier or more tardy success; just in proportion as the measures
  adopted were more or less judiciously adapted to the object in
  view; and applied and pursued with more or less energy and
  perseverance。
  England; above all other nations; has adopted this policy。
  Often interrupted in its execution from the want of intelligence
  and self…restraint on the part of her rulers; or owing to internal
  commotions and foreign wars; it first assumed the character of a
  settled and practically efficient policy under Edward VI;
  Elizabeth; and the revolutionary period。 For how could the measures
  of Edward III work satisfactorily when it was not till under Henry
  VI that the law permitted the carriage of corn from one English
  county to another; or the shipment of it to foreign parts; when
  still under Henry VII and Henry VIII all interest on money; even
  discount on bills; was held to be usury; and when it was still
  thought at the time that trade might be encouraged by fixing by law
  at a low figure the price of woollen goods and the rate of wages;
  and that the production of corn could be increased by prohibiting
  sheep farming on a large scale?
  And how much sooner would England's woollen manufactures and
  maritime trade have reached a high standard of prosperity had not
  Henry VIII regarded a rise in the prices of corn as an evil; had
  he; instead of driving foreign workmen by wholesale from the
  kingdom; sought like his predecessors to augment their number by
  encouraging their immigration; and had not Henry VII refused his
  sanction to the Act of Navigation as proposed by Parliament?
  In France we see native manufactures; free internal
  intercourse; foreign trade; fisheries; navigation; and naval power
  in a word; all the attributes of a great; mighty; and rich
  nation (which it had cost England the persevering efforts of
  centuries to acquire)  called into existence by a great genius
  within the space of a few years; as it were by a magician's wand;
  and afterwards all of them yet more speedily annihilated by the
  iron hand of fanaticism and despotism。
  We see the principle of free trade contending in vain under
  unfavourable conditions against restriction powerfully enforced;
  the Hanseatic League is ruined; while Holland sinks under the blows
  of England and France。
  That a restrictive commercial policy can be operative for good
  only so far as it is supported by the progressive civilisation and
  free institutions of a nation; we learn from the decay of Venice;
  Spain; and Portugal; from the relapse of France in consequence of
  the revocation of the Edict of Nantes; and from the history of
  England; in which country liberty kept pace at all times with the
  advance of industry; trade; and national wealth。
  That; on the contrary; a highly advanced state of civilisation;
  with or without free institutions; unless supported by a suitable
  system of commercial policy; will prove but a poor guarantee for a
  nation's economic progress; may be learnt on the one hand from the
  history of the North American free states; and on the other from
  the experience of Germany。
  Modern Germany; lacking a system of vigorous and united
  commercial policy; exposed in her home markets to competition with
  a foreign manufacturing power in every way superior to her own;
  while excluded at the same time from foreign markets by arbitrary
  and often capricious restrictions; and very far indeed from making
  that progress in industry to which her degree of culture entitles
  her; c