their　safety　depended　upon　their　doing　so；　and　that　their　own
  militia　was　altogether　incapable　of　resisting　the　attack　of　such
  an　army。
  The　soldiers　of　a　standing　army；　though　they　may　never　have
  seen　an　enemy；　yet　have　frequently　appeared　to　possess　all　the
  courage　of　veteran　troops　and　the　very　moment　that　they　took　the
  field　to　have　been　fit　to　face　the　hardiest　and　most　experienced
  veterans。　In　1756；　when　the　Russian　army　marched　into　Poland；　the
  valour　of　the　Russian　soldiers　did　not　appear　inferior　to　that　of
  the　Prussians；　at　that　time　supposed　to　be　the　hardiest　and　most
  experienced　veterans　in　Europe。　The　Russian　empire；　however；　had
  enjoyed　a　profound　peace　for　near　twenty　years　before；　and　could
  at　that　time　have　very　few　soldiers　who　had　ever　seen　an　enemy。
  When　the　Spanish　war　broke　out　in　1739；　England　had　enjoyed　a
  profound　peace　for　about　eight…and…twenty　years。　The　valour　of
  her　soldiers；　however；　far　from　being　corrupted　by　that　long
  peace；　was　never　more　distinguished　than　in　the　attempt　upon
  Carthagena；　the　first　unfortunate　exploit　of　that　unfortunate
  war。　In　a　long　peace　the　generals；　perhaps；　may　sometimes　forget
  their　skill；　but；　where　a　well…regulated　standing　army　has　been
  kept　up；　the　soldiers　seem　never　to　forget　their　valour。
  When　a　civilised　nation　depends　for　its　defence　upon　a
  militia；　it　is　at　all　times　exposed　to　be　conquered　by　any
  barbarous　nation　which　happens　to　be　in　its　neighbourhood。　The
  frequent　conquests　of　all　the　civilised　countries　in　Asia　by　the
  Tartars　sufficiently　demonstrates　the　natural　superiority　which
  the　militia　of　a　barbarous　has　over　that　of　a　civilised　nation。　A
  well…regulated　standing　army　is　superior　to　every　militia。　Such
  an　army；　as　it　can　best　be　maintained　by　an　opulent　and　civilised
  nation；　so　it　can　alone　defend　such　a　nation　against　the　invasion
  of　a　poor　and　barbarous　neighbour。　It　is　only　by　means　of　a
  standing　army；　therefore；　that　the　civilization　of　any　country
  can　be　perpetuated；　or　even　preserved　for　any　considerable　time。
  As　it　is　only　by　means　of　a　well…regulated　standing　army
  that　a　civilised　country　can　be　defended；　so　it　is　only　by　means
  of　it　that　a　barbarous　country　can　be　suddenly　and　tolerably
  civilised。　A　standing　army　establishes；　with　an　irresistible
  force；　the　law　of　the　sovereign　through　the　remotest　provinces　of
  the　empire；　and　maintains　some　degree　of　regular　government　in
  countries　which　could　not　otherwise　admit　of　any。　Whoever
  examines；　with　attention；　the　improvements　which　Peter　the　Great
  introduced　into　the　Russian　empire；　will　find　that　they　almost
  all　resolve　themselves　into　the　establishment　of　a　well　regulated
  standing　army。　It　is　the　instrument　which　executes　and　maintains
  all　his　other　regulations。　That　degree　of　order　and　internal
  peace　which　that　empire　has　ever　since　enjoyed　is　altogether
  owing　to　the　influence　of　that　army。
  Men　of　republican　principles　have　been　jealous　of　a　standing
  army　as　dangerous　to　liberty。　It　certainly　is　so　wherever　the
  interest　of　the　general　and　that　of　the　principal　officers　are
  not　necessarily　connected　with　the　support　of　the　constitution　of
  the　state。　The　standing　army　of　Caesar　destroyed　the　Roman
  republic。　The　standing　army　of　Cromwell　turned　the　Long
  Parliament　out　of　doors。　But　where　the　sovereign　is　himself　the
  general；　and　the　principal　nobility　and　gentry　of　the　country　the
  chief　officers　of　the　army；　where　the　military　force　is　placed
  under　the　command　of　those　who　have　the　greatest　interest　in　the
  support　of　the　civil　authority；　because　they　have　themselves　the
  greatest　share　of　that　authority；　a　standing　army　can　never　be
  dangerous　to　liberty。　On　the　contrary；　it　may　in　some　cases　be
  favourable　to　liberty。　The　security　which　it　gives　to　the
  sovereign　renders　unnecessary　that　troublesome　jealousy；　which；
  in　some　modern　republics；　seems　to　watch　over　the　minutest
  actions；　and　to　be　at　all　times　ready　to　disturb　the　peace　of
  every　citizen。　Where　the　security　of　the　magistrate；　though
  supported　by　the　principal　people　of　the　country；　is　endangered
  by　every　popular　discontent；　where　a　small　tumult　is　capable　of
  bringing　about　in　a　few　hours　a　great　revolution；　the　whole
  authority　of　government　must　be　employed　to　suppress　and　punish
  every　murmur　and　complaint　against　it。　To　a　sovereign；　on　the
  contrary；　who　feels　himself　supported；　not　only　by　the　natural
  aristocracy　of　the　country；　but　by　a　well…regulated　standing
  army；　the　rudest；　the　most　groundless；　and　the　most　licentious
  remonstrances　can　give　little　disturbance。　He　can　safely　pardon
  or　neglect　them；　and　his　consciousness　of　his　own　superiority
  naturally　disposes　him　to　do　so。　That　degree　of　liberty　which
  approaches　to　licentiousness　can　be　tolerated　only　in　countries
  where　the　sovereign　is　secured　by　a　well…regulated　standing　army。
  It　is　in　such　countries　only　that　the　public　safety　does　not
  require　that　the　sovereign　should　be　trusted　with　any
  discretionary　power　for　suppressing　even　the　impertinent
  wantonness　of　this　licentious　liberty。
  The　first　duty　of　the　sovereign；　therefore；　that　of
  defending　the　society　from　the　violence　and　injustice　of　other
  independent　societies；　grows　gradually　more　and　more　expensive　as
  the　society　advances　in　civilization。　The　military　force　of　the
  society；　which　originally　cost　the　sovereign　no　expense　either　in
  time　of　peace　or　in　time　of　war；　must；　in　the　progress　of
  improvement；　first　be　maintained　by　him　in　time　of　war；　and
  afterwards　even　in　time　of　peace。
  The　great　change　introduced　into　the　art　of　war　by　the
  invention　of　firearms　has　enhanced　still　further　both　the　expense
  of　exercising　and　disciplining　any　particular　number　of　soldiers
  in　time　of　peace；　and　that　of　employing　them　in　time　of　war。　Both
  their　arms　and　their　ammunition　are　become　more　expensive。　A
  musket　is　a　more　expensive　machine　than　a　javelin　or　a　bow　and
  arrows；　a　cannon　or　a　mortar　than　a　balista　or　a　catapulta。　The
  powder　which　is　spent　in　a　modern　review　is　lost　irrecoverably；
  and　occasions　a　very　considerable　expense。　The　javeline　and
  arrows　which　were　thrown　or　shot　in　an　ancient　one　could　easily
  be　picked　up　again；　and　were　besides　of　very　little　value。　The
  cannon　and　the　mortar　are　not　only　much　dearer；　but　much　heavier
  machines　than　the　balista　or　catapulta；　and　require　a　greater
  expense；　not　only　to　prepare　them　for　the　field；　but　to　carry
  them　to　it。　As　the　superiority　of　the　modern　artillery　too　over
  that　of　the　ancients　is　very　great；　it　has　become　much　more
  difficult；　and　consequently　much　more　expensive；　to　fortify　a
  town　so　as　to　resist　even　for　a　few　weeks　the　attack　of　that
  superior　artillery。　In　modern　times　many　different　causes
  contribute　to　render　the　defence　of　the　society　more　expensive。
  The　unavoidable　effects　of　the　natural　progress　of　improvement
  have；　in　this　respect；　been　a　good　deal　enhanced　by　a　great
  revolution　in　the　art　of　war；　to　which　a　mere　accident；　the
  invention　of　gunpowder；　seems　to　have　given　occasion。
  In　modern　war　the　great　expense　of　firearms　gives　an　evident
  advantage　to　the　nation　which　can　best　afford　that　expense；　and
  consequently　to　an　opulent　and　civilised　over　a　poor　and
  barbarous　nation。　In　ancient　times　the　opulent　and　civilised
  found　it　difficult　to　defend　themselves　against　the　poor　and
  barbarous　nations。　In　modern　times　the　poor　and　barbarous　find　it
  difficult　to　defend　themselves　against　the　opulent　and　civilised。
  The　invention　of　firearms；　an　invention　which　at　first　sight
  appears　to　be　so　pernicious；　is　certainly　favourable　both　to　the
  permanency　and　to　the　extension　of　civilization。
  PART　2
  Of　the　Expense　of　Justice
  THE　second　duty　of　the　sovereign；　that　of　protecting；　as　far
  as　possible；　every　member　of　the　society　from　the　injustice　or
  oppression　of　every　other　member　of　it；　or　the　duty　of
  establishing　an　exact　administration　of　justice；　requires；　too；
  very　different　degrees　of　expense　in　the　different　periods　of
  society。
  Among　nations　of　hunters；　as　there　is　scarce　any　property；
  or　at　least　none　that　exceeds　the　value　of　two　or　three　days'
  labour；　so　there　is　seldom　any　established　magistrate　or　any
  regular　administration　of　justice。　Men　who　have　no　property　can
  injure　one　another　only　in　their　persons　or　reputations。　But　when
  one　man　kills；　wounds；　beats；　or　defames　another；　though　he　to
  whom　the　injury　is　done　suffers；　he　who　does　it　receives　no
  benefit。　It　is　otherwise　with　the　injuries　to　property。　The
  benefit　of　the　person　who　does　the　injury　is　often　equal　to　the
  loss　of　him　who　suffers　it。　Envy；　malice；　or　resentment　are　the
  only　passions　which　can　prompt　one　man　to　injure　another　in　his
  person　or　reputation。　But　the　greater　part　of　men　are　not　very
  frequently　under　the　influence　of　those　passions；　and　the　very
  worst　of　men　are　so　only　occasionally