accidental。　If　the　judgments　of　existence　may　also　be　defined　as　judgments　of　inherence；
  judgments　of　reflection　are；　on　the　contrary；　judgments　of　subsumption。
  （a）　The　Singular　Judgment
  （b）　The　Particular　Judgment
  （c）　The　Universal　Judgment
  C。　THE　JUDGMENT　OF　NECESSITY
  The　determination　to　which　universality　has　advanced　is；　as　we　have　seen；　the　universality　which
  is　in　and　for　itself　or　objective；　to　which　in　the　sphere　of　essence　substantiality　corresponds。　It
  is　distinguished　from　the　latter　in　that　it　belongs　to　the　Notion　and　is　therefore　not　merely　the　inner
  but　also　the　posited　necessity　of　its　determinations；　or；　in　other　words；　the　difference　is　immanent
  in　it；　whereas　substance　has　its　difference　only　in　its　accidents；　but　not　as　principle　within　itself。
  Now　in　the　judgment；　this　objective　universality　is　posited；　first；　therefore；　with　this　its　essential
  determinateness　as　immanent　in　it；　secondly；　with　its　determinateness　distinguished　from　it　as
  particularity；　of　which　this　universality　constitutes　the　substantial　basis。　In　this　way　it　is　determined
  as　genus　and　species。
  （a）　The　Categorical　Judgment
  （b）　The　Hypothetical　Judgment
  （c）　The　Disjunctive　Judgment
  D。　THE　JUDGMENT　OF　THE　NOTION
  The　ability　to　form　judgments　of　existence　such　as　'the　rose　is　red'；　'snow　is　white'；　and　so　forth；
  will　hardly　count　as　evidence　of　great　powers　of　judgment。　The　judgments　of　reflection　are
  rather　propositions；　in　the　judgment　of　necessity　the　object　appears；　it　is　true；　in　its　objective
  universality；　but　it　is　only　in　the　judgment　now　to　be　considered　that　its　relation　to　the　Notion　is
  found。　In　this　judgment　the　Notion　is　laid　down　as　the　basis；　and　since　it　is　in　relation　to　the
  object；　it　is　an　ought…to…be　to　which　the　reality　may　or　may　not　be　adequate。　Therefore　it　is　only　a
  judgment　of　this　kind　that　contains　a　true　appreciation；　the　predicates　good；　bad；　true；　beautiful；
  correct；　etc。　express　that　the　thing　is　measured　against　its　universal　Notion　as　the　simply
  presupposed　ought…to…be　and　is；　or　is　not；　in　agreement　with　it。
  The　judgment　of　the　Notion　has　been　called　the　judgment　of　modality　and　it　has　been　regarded　as
  containing　that　form　of　the　relationship　between　subject　and　predicate　which　is　found　in　an　external
  understanding；　and　to　be　concerned　with　the　value　of　the　copula　only　in　relation　to　thinking。
  According　to　this　view；　the　problematical　judgment　is　one　where　the　affirmation　or　denial　is　taken
  as　optional　or　possible；　the　assertoric；　where　it　is　taken　as　true；　that　is　as　actual；　and　the
  apodeictic；　where　it　is　taken　as　necessary。　It　is　easy　to　see　why　it　is　so　natural　in　the　case　of　this
  judgment　to　step　out　of　the　sphere　of　judgment　itself　and　to　regard　its　determination　as　something
  merely　subjective。　For　here　it　is　the　Notion；　or　the　subjective；　that　reappears　in　the　judgment　and
  stands　in　relationship　to　an　external　actuality。　But　this　subjectivity　is　not　to　be　confused　with
  external　reflection；　which　of　course　is　also　something　subjective；　but　in　a　different　sense　from　the
  Notion　itself；　on　the　contrary；　the　Notion　that　re…emerges　from　the　disjunctive　judgment　is　the
  opposite　of　a　mere　contingent　mode。　The　earlier　judgments　are　in　this　sense　merely　subjective；
  for　they　are　based　on　an　abstraction　and　one…sidedness　in　which　the　Notion　is　lost。　The　judgment
  of　the　Notion；　on　the　contrary；　is　objective　and　the　truth　as　against　those　earlier　judgments；　just
  because　it　has　for　its　basis　the　Notion；　not　the　Notion　in　external　reflection　or　in　relation　to　a
  subjective；　that　is　contingent；　thinking；　but　the　Notion　in　its　determinateness　as　Notion。
  In　the　disjunctive　judgment　the　Notion　was　posited　as　identity　of　the　universal　nature　with　its
  particularisation；　consequently　the　relation　of　the　judgment　was　cancelled。　This　concretion　of
  universality　and　particularisation　is；　at　first；　a　simple　result；　it　has　now　to　develop　itself　further　into
  totality；　since　the　moments　which　it　contains　are　at　first　swallowed　up　in　it　and　as　yet　do　not
  confront　one　another　in　determinate　self…subsistence。　The　defect　of　the　result　may　also　be　more
  definitely　expressed　by　saying　that　in　the　disjunctive　judgment；　although　objective　universality　has
  completed　itself　in　its　particularisation；　yet　the　negative　unity　of　the　latter　merely　returns　into　the
  former　and　has　not　yet　determined　itself　to　the　third　moment；　that　of　individuality。　Yet　in　so　far
  as　the　result　itself　is　negative　unity；　it　is　indeed　already　this　individuality；　but　as　such　it　is　only
  this　one　determinateness；　which　has　now　to　posit　its　negativity；　sunder　itself　into　the　extremes　and
  in　this　way　finally　develop　into　the　syllogism。
  The　proximate　diremption　of　this　unity　is　the　judgment　in　which　it　is　posited　first　as　subject；　as　an
  immediate　individual；　and　then　as　predicate；　as　the　determinate　relation　of　its　moments。
  （a）　The　Assertoric　Judgment
  （b）　The　Problematic　Judgment
  （c）　The　Apodetic　Judgment
  。。。　This　judgment；　then；　is　truly　objective；　or　it　is　the　truth　of　the　judgment　in　general。　Subject　and
  predicate　correspond　to　each　other　and　have　the　same　content；　and　this　content　is　itself　the
  posited　concrete　universality；　it　contains；　namely；　the　two　moments；　the　objective　universal　or
  the　enus；　and　the　individualised　universal。　Here；　therefore；　we　have　the　universal　which　is　itself
  and　continues　itself　through　its　opposite　and　is　a　universal　only　as　unity　with　this　opposite。　A
  universal　of　this　kind；　such　as　the　predicate　good；　suitable；　correct；　etc。；　is　based　on　an
  ought…to…be　and　at　the　same　time　contains　the　correspondence　of　existence　to　that　ought…to…be；
  it　is　not　this　ought…to…be　or　the　genus　by　itself；　but　this　correspondence　that　is　the　universality
  which　constitutes　the　predicate　of　the　apodeictic　judgment。
  The　subject　likewise　contains　these　two　moments　in　immediate　unity　as　the　fact。　But　it　is　the　truth
  of　the　fact　that　it　is　internally　split　into　what　it　ought…to…be　and　what　it　is；　this　is　the　absolute
  judgment　on　all　actuality。　It　is　because　this　original　partition；　which　is　the　omnipotence　of　the
  Notion；　is　just　as　much　a　return　into　its　unity　and　an　absolute　relation　of　the　ought…to…be　and　being
  to　each　other　that　makes　what　is　actual　into　a　fact；　its　inner　relation；　this　concrete　identity；
  constitutes　the　soul　of　the　fact。
  The　transition　from　the　immediate　simplicity　of　the　fact　to　the　correspondence　which　is　the
  determinate　relation　of　its　ought…to…be　and　its　being…or　the　copula…is　now　seen；　on　closer
  examination；　to　lie　in　the　particular　determinateness　of　the　fact。　The　genus　is　the　universal　in　and
  for　itself；　which　as　such　appears　as　the　unrelated；　while　the　determinateness　is　that　which　in　that
  universal　is　reflected　into　itself；　yet　at　the　same　time　is　reflected　into　an　other。　The　judgment
  therefore　has　its　ground　in　the　constitution　of　the　subject　and　thereby　is　apodeictic。　Hence　we
  now　have　before　us　the　determinate　and　fulfilled　copula；　which　formerly　consisted　in　the
  abstract　'is'；　but　has　now　further　developed　itself　into　ground　in　general。　It　appears　at　first　as　an
  immediate　determinateness　in　the　subject；　but　it　is　no　less　the　relation　to　the　predicate　which　has
  no　other　content　than　this　very　correspondence；　or　the　relation　of　the　subject　to　the　universality。
  Thus　the　form　of　the　judgment　has　perished；　first　because　subject　and　predicate　are　in　themselves
  the　same　content；　secondly　because　the　subject　through　its　determinateness　points　beyond　itself
  and　relates　itself　to　the　predicate；　but　also；　thirdly；　this　relating　has　passed　over　into　the
  predicate；　alone。　constitutes　its　content；　and　is　thus　the　posited　relation；　or　the　judgment　itself。
  Thus　the　concrete　identity　of　the　Notion　which　was　the　result　of　the　disjunctive　judgment　and
  which　constitutes　the　inner　basis　of　the　Notion　judgment…which　identity　was　at　first　posited　only　in
  the　predicate…is　now　restored　in　the　whole。
  If　we　examine　the　positive　element　of　this　result　which　effects　the　transition　of　the　judgment　into
  another　form；　we　find；　as　we　have　seen；　that　subject　and　predicate　in　the　apodeictic　judgment　are
  each　the　whole　Notion。　The　unity　of　the　Notion　as　the　determinateness　constituting　the　copula
  that　relates　them；　is　at　the　same　time　distinct　from　them。　At　first；　it　stands　only　on　the　other　side　of
  the　subject　as　the　latter's　immediate　constitution。　But　since　it　is　essentially　that　which　relates
  subject　and　predicate；　it　is　not　merely　such　immediate　constitution　but　the　universal　that
  permeates　both　subject　and　predicate。　While　subject　and　predicate　have　the　same　content；　the
  form　relation；　on　the　other　hand；　is　posited　through　this　determinateness；　determinateness　as　a
  universal　or　particularity。　Thus　it　contains　within　itself　the　two　form　determinations　of　the
  extremes　and　is　the　determinate　relation　of　subject　and　predicate；　it　is　the　fulfilled　copula　of　the
  judgment；　the　copula　pregnant　with　content；　the　unity　of　the　Notion　that　has　re…emerged　from
  the　judgment　in　which　it　was　lost　in　the　extremes。　Through　this　impregnation　of　the　copula　the
  judgment　has　become　the　syllogism。
  THE　DOCTRINE　OF　THE