第 12 节
作者:
匆匆 更新:2021-02-27 02:11 字数:9319
is ego; or consciousness。 The form; when thus thought out into its purity; will have within itself the
capacity to determine itself; that is; to give itself a content; and that a necessarily explicated
content in the form of a system of determinations of thought。
The objective logic; then; takes the place rather of the former metaphysics which was intended to
be the scientific construction of the world in terms of thoughts alone。 If we have regard to the final
shape of this science; then it is first and immediately ontology whose place is taken by objective
logic — that part of this metaphysics which was supposed to investigate the nature of ens in
general; ens comprises both being and essence; a distinction for which the German language has
fortunately preserved different terms。 But further; objective logic also comprises the rest of
metaphysics in so far as this attempted to comprehend with the forms of pure thought particular
substrata taken primarily from figurate conception; namely the soul; the world and God; and the
determinations of thought constituted what was essential in the mode of consideration。 Logic;
however; considers these forms free from those substrata; from the subjects of figurate
conception; it considers them; their nature and worth; in their own proper character。 Former
metaphysics omitted to do this and consequently incurred the just reproach of having employed
these forms uncritically without a preliminary investigation as to whether and how they were
capable of being determinations of the thing…in…itself; to use the Kantian expression — or rather of
the Reasonable。 Objective logic is therefore the genuine critique of them — a critique which does
not consider them as contrasted under the abstract forms of the a priori and the a posteriori; but
considers the determinations themselves according to their specific content。
The subjective logic is the logic of the Notion; of essence which has sublated its relation to being
or its illusory being 'Schein'; and in its determination is no longer external but is subjective free;
self…subsistent and self…determining; or rather it is the subject itself。 Since subjectivity brings with it
the misconception of contingency and caprice and; in general; characteristics belonging to the form
of consciousness; no particular importance is to be attached here to the distinction of subjective
and objective; these determinations will be more precisely developed later on in the logic itself。
Logic thus falls generally into objective and subjective logic; but more specifically it has three parts:
I The logic of being
II The logic of essence; and
III The logic of the Notion
VOLUME ONE: THE OBJECTIVE LOGIC
Quality … Quantity … Measure
BOOK ONE
THE DOCTRINE OF BEING
Section One: Determinateness (Quality)
Being is the indeterminate immediate; it is free from determinateness in relation to essence and
also from any which it can possess within itself。 This reflectionless being is being as it is
immediately in its own self alone。
Because it is indeterminate being; it lacks all quality; but in itself; the character of
indeterminateness attaches to it only in contrast to what is determinate or qualitative。 But
determinate being stands in contrast to being in general; so that the very indeterminateness of the
latter constitutes its quality。 It will therefore be shown that the first being is in itself determinate; and
therefore; secondly; that it passes over into determinate being … is determinate being … but that
this latter as finite being sublates itself and passes over into the infinite relation of being to its own
self; that is; thirdly; into being…for…self。
Chapter 1 Being
A Being
Being; pure being; without any further determination。 In its indeterminate immediacy it is equal
only to itself。 It is also not unequal relatively to an other; it has no diversity within itself nor any with
a reference outwards。 It would not be held fast in its purity if it contained any determination or
content which could be distinguished in it or by which it could be distinguished from an other。 It is
pure indeterminateness and emptiness。 There is nothing to be intuited in it; if one can speak here
of intuiting; or; it is only this pure intuiting itself。 Just as little is anything to be thought in it; or it is
equally only this empty thinking。 Being; the indeterminate immediate; is in fact nothing; and neither
more nor less than nothing。
B Nothing
Nothing; pure nothing: it is simply equality with itself; complete emptiness; absence of all
determination and content … undifferentiatedness in itself。 In so far as intuiting or thinking can be
mentioned here; it counts as a distinction whether something or nothing is intuited or thought。 To
intuit or think nothing has; therefore; a meaning; both are distinguished and thus nothing is (exists)
in our intuiting or thinking; or rather it is empty intuition and thought itself; and the same empty
intuition or thought as pure being。 Nothing is; therefore; the same determination; or rather absence
of determination; and thus altogether the same as; pure being。?
C Becoming
1。 Unity of Being and Nothing
Pure Being and pure nothing are; therefore; the same。 What is the truth is neither being nor
nothing; but that being … does not pass over but has passed over … into nothing; and nothing into
being。 But it is equally true that they are not undistinguished from each other; that; on the contrary;
they are not the same; that they are absolutely distinct; and yet that they are unseparated and
inseparable and that each each immediately vanishes in its opposite。 Their truth is therefore; this
movement of the immediate vanishing of the one into the other: becoming; a movement in which
both are distinguished; but by a difference which has equally immediately resolved itself。
Remark 1: The Opposition of Being and Nothing in Ordinary Thinking
Remark 2: Defectiveness of the Expression 'Unity; Identity of Being and Nothing'
Remark 3: The Isolating of These Abstractions
Remark 4: Incomprehensibility of the Beginning
2。 Moments of Becoming: Coming…to…be and Ceasing…to…be
3。 The Sublation of Becoming
Remark: The Expression 'To Sublate'
To sublate; and the sublated (that which exists ideally as a moment); constitute one of the most
important notions in philosophy。 It is a fundamental determination which repeatedly occurs
throughout the whole of philosophy; the meaning of which is to be clearly grasped and especially
distinguished from nothing。 What is sublated is not thereby reduced to nothing。 Nothing is
immediate; what is sublated; on the other hand; is the result of mediation; it is a non…being but as
a result which had its origin in a being。 It still has; therefore; in itself the determinateness from
which it originates。
To sublate; and the sublated (that which exists ideally as a moment) constitute one of the most
important notions in philosophy。 It is a fundamental determination which repeatedly occurs
throughout the whole of philosophy; the meaning of which is to be clearly grasped and especially
distinguished from nothing。 What is sublated is not thereby reduced to nothing。 Nothing is
immediate; what is sublated; on the other hand; is the result of mediation; it is a non…being but as
a result which had its origin in a being。 It still has; therefore; in itself the determinate from which
it originates。
'To sublate' has a twofold meaning in the language: on the one hand it means to preserve; to
maintain; and equally it also means to cause to cease; to put an end to。 Even 'to preserve' includes
a negative elements; namely; that something is removed from its influences; in order to preserve it。
Thus what is sublated is at the same time preserved; it has only lost its immediacy but is not on that
account annihilated。
The two definitions of 'to sublate' which we have given can be quoted as two dictionary meanings
of this word。 But it is certainly remarkable to find that a language has come to use one and the
same word for two opposite meanings。 It is a delight to speculative thought to find in the language
words which have in themselves a speculative meaning; the German language has a number of
such。 The double meaning of the Latin tollere (which has become famous through the Ciceronian
pun: tollendum est Octavium) does not go so far; its affirmative determination signifies only a
lifting…up。 Something is sublated only in so far as it has entered into unity with its opposite; in this
more particular signification as something reflected; it may fittingly be called a moment。 In the case
of the lever; weight and distance from a point are called its mechanical moments on account of the
sameness of their effect; in spite of the contrast otherwise between something real; such as a
weight; and something ideal; such as a mere spatial determination; a line。' We shall often have
occasion to notice that the technical language of philosophy employs Latin terms for reflected
determinations; either because the mother tongue has no words for them or if it has; as