第 24 节
作者:敏儿不觉      更新:2021-02-24 22:58      字数:9322
  saying that if the charge was twice or thrice as much she could send for a
  friend    who    would     pay   it。  Her    attitude   probably     made    the   turnkey
  suspicious。      At   any  rate;  after   Sarah   had   mixed   for   some   time   with   the
  felons in the prison taproom; Johnson called her out and; lighting the way
  by use of a link; led her to an empty room。
  ‘‘Child;'' he said; ‘‘there is reason to suspect that you are guilty of this
  murder; and therefore I have orders to search you。''             He had; he admitted;
  no such orders。       He felt under her arms; whereupon she started and threw
  back her head。       Johnson clapped his hand on her head and felt something
  hard。    He pulled off her cap; and found a bag of money in her hair。
  ‘‘I asked her;'' Johnson said in the witness…box; ‘‘how she came by it;
  and she said it was some of Mrs Duncomb's money。                    ‘But; Mr Johnson;'
  says she; ‘I'll make you a present of it if you will keep it to yourself; and
  let nobody know anything of the matter。             The other things against me are
  nothing     but   circumstances;     and   I  shall  come    well   enough     off。   And
  therefore I only desire you to let me have threepence or sixpence a day till
  the sessions be over; then I shall be at liberty to shift for myself。' ''
  77
  … Page 78…
  SHE STANDS ACCUSED
  To the best of his knowledge; said this turnkey; having told the money
  over; there were twenty moidores; eighteen guineas; five broad pieces; a
  half…broad   piece;   five   crowns;   and   two   or   three   shillings。  He   thought
  there was also a twenty…five…shilling piece and some others; twenty…three…
  shilling pieces。      He had sealed them up in the bag; and there they were
  (producing the bag in court)。
  The court asked how she said she had come by the money。
  Johnson's   answer   was   that   she   had   said she   took   the   money  and   the
  bag from Mrs Duncomb; and that she had begged him to keep it secret。
  ‘‘My dear;'' said this virtuous gaoler; ‘‘I would not secrete the money for
  the world。
  ‘‘She told me; too;'' runs Johnson's recorded testimony; ‘‘that she had
  hired three men to swear the tankard was her grandmother's; but could not
  depend on them:   that the name of one   was William  Denny; another   was
  Smith; and I have forgot the third。         After I had taken the money away she
  put a piece of mattress in her hair; that it might appear of the same bulk as
  before。     Then I locked her up and sent to Mr Alstone; and told him the
  story。    ‘And;' says I; ‘do you stand in a dark place to be witness of what
  she says; and I'll go and examine her again。'''
  Sarah interrupted:       ‘‘I tied my handkerchief over my hair to hide the
  money; but Buck;'19' happening to see my hair fall down; he told Johnson;
  upon which Johnson came to see me and said; ‘I find the cole's planted in
  your hair。     Let me keep it for you and let Buck know nothing about it。'
  So I gave Johnson five broad pieces and twenty…two guineas; not gratis;
  but only to keep for me; for I expected it to be returned when sessions was
  over。    As to the money; I never said I took it from Mrs Duncomb; but he
  asked   me   what   they  had   to   rap   against   me。  I   told   him   only   a   tankard。
  He asked me if it was Mrs Duncomb's; and I said yes。''
  '19' Peter Buck; a prisoner。
  The   Court:    ‘‘Johnson;   were   those   her   words:     ‘This   is   the   money
  and bag that I took'?''
  Johnson:     ‘‘Yes; and she desired me to make away with the bag。''
  Johnson's evidence was confirmed in part by Alstone; another officer
  78
  … Page 79…
  SHE STANDS ACCUSED
  of the prison。      He said he told Johnson to get the bag from the prisoner;
  as   it  might    have    something     about    it  whereby     it  could   be   identified。
  Johnson called   the girl;  while Alstone   watched   from  a   dark   corner。            He
  saw     Sarah    give   Johnson     the  bag;   and   heard    her   ask  him    to  burn   it。
  Alstone   also   deposed   that   Sarah   told   him   (Alstone)   part   of   the   money
  found on her was Mrs Duncomb's。
  There   is   no   need   here   to   enlarge   upon   the   oddly   slack   and   casual
  conditions of the prison life of the time as revealed in this evidence。                     It
  will be no news to anyone who has studied contemporary criminal history。
  There   is   a   point;   however;   that   may   be   considered   here;   and   that   is   the
  familiarity it suggests on the part of Sarah with prison conditions and with
  the cant terms employed by criminals and the people handling them。
  Sarah; though still in her earliest twenties;'20' was known alreadyif
  not   in   the   Templeto   have   a   bad   reputation。   It   is   said   that   her   closest
  friends    were    thieves    of  the  worst    sort。   She    was    the  daughter     of  an
  Englishman; at one time a public official in a small way in Dublin。                      Her
  father had come to London with his wife and daughter; but on the death of
  the   mother   had   gone   back   to   Ireland。    He   had   left   his   daughter   behind
  him; servant in an ale…house called the Black Horse。
  '20' Born 1711; Durham; according to The Newgate Calendar。
  Sarah was a fairly well…educated girl。            At the ale…house; however; she
  formed   an   acquaintance   with   a   woman   named   Mary  Tracey;   a   dissolute
  character;     and    with    two   thieves    called    Alexander。       Of    these    three
  disreputable      people    we    shall  be   hearing    presently;    for  Sarah    tried  to
  implicate them in this crime which she certainly committed alone。                        It is
  said that the Newgate officers recognized Sarah on her arrival。                     She had
  often been to the prison to visit an Irish thief; convicted for stealing the
  pack of a Scots pedlar。
  It   will   be   seen   from  Sarah's   own   defence   how   she tried to   implicate
  Tracey and the two Alexanders:
  ‘‘I   freely   own    that   my   crimes     deserve    death;    I  own    that  I  was
  accessory to the robbery; but I was innocent of the murder; and will give
  an account of the whole affair。
  79
  … Page 80…
  SHE STANDS ACCUSED
  ‘‘I lived with Mrs Lydia Duncomb about three months before she was
  murdered。       The   robbery  was   contrived by  Mary Tracey;   who   is   now   in
  confinement; and myself; my own vicious inclinations agreeing with hers。
  We likewise proposed to rob Mr Oakes in Thames Street。                       She came to
  me    at  my    master's;   Mr    Kerrel's   chambers;     on   the   Sunday    before    the
  murder      was   committed;      he  not   being   then   at  home;     we   talked   about
  robbing Mrs Duncomb。            I told her I could not pretend to do it by myself;
  for I should be found out。          ‘No;' says she; ‘there are the two Alexanders
  will   help   us。'   Next    day   I  had   seventeen     pounds    sent   me   out   of  the
  country; which I left in Mr Kerrel's drawers。             I met them all in Cheapside
  the following Friday; and we agreed on the next night; and so parted。
  ‘‘Next   day;   being   Saturday;   I   went   between   seven   and   eight   in   the
  evening   to   see   Mrs   Duncomb's   maid;   Elizabeth   Harrison;   who   was   very
  bad。    I stayed a little   while with her; and   went down; and Mary Tracey
  and    the   two   Alexanders      came    to  me   about    ten  o'clock;    according     to
  appointment。''
  On this statement the whole implication of Tracey and the Alexanders
  by Sarah stands or falls。        It falls for the reason that the Temple porter had
  seen   no   stranger  pass   the gate that night; nobody  but Templars going   to
  their   chambers。       The   one   fact   riddles   the   rest   of   Sarah's   statement   in
  defence; but; as it is somewhat of a masterpiece in lying invention; I shall
  continue      to  quote   it。      ‘‘Mary     Tracey     would    have    gone   about    the
  robbery just then; but I said it was too soon。            Between ten and eleven she
  said;   ‘We   can   do   it   now。' I   told   her   I   would   go   and   see;   and   so   went
  upstairs; and they followed me。           I met the young maid on the stairs with a
  blue mug; she was going for some milk to make a sack posset。                    She asked
  me who were those that came after me。               I told her they were peop