第 17 节
作者:敏儿不觉      更新:2021-02-24 22:58      字数:9322
  men quarrelled。
  That Overbury had knowledge of some such essential secret as this is
  manifest in the enmity towards the man which Lady Essex exhibited; even
  when he lay; out of the way of doing harm; in the Tower。                   It is hard to
  believe that an innocent girl of twenty; conscious of her virgin chastity; in
  mere fear of scandal which she knew would be baseless; could pursue the
  life   of   a   man   with   the   venom   that;   as   we   shall   presently   see;   Frances
  Howard used towards Overbury through Mrs Turner。
  % V
  54
  … Page 55…
  SHE STANDS ACCUSED
  As a preliminary to his marriage with Frances Howard; Rochester was
  created Earl of Somerset; and had the barony of Brancepeth bestowed on
  him   by   the   King。    Overbury   was   three   months   in   his   grave   when   the
  marriage   was   celebrated   in   the   midst   of   the   most   extravagant   show   and
  entertainment。
  The new Earl's power in the kingdom was never so high as at this time。
  It was; indeed; at its zenith。       Decline was soon to set in。         It will not serve
  here    to  follow    the  whole    process    of  decay    in  the   King's   favour    that
  Somerset       was   now    to   experience。      There     was   poetic    justice   in  his
  downfall。      With hands all about him itching to bring him to the ground;
  he had not the brain for the giddy heights。             If behind him there had been
  the man whose guidance had made him sure…footed in the climb he might
  have survived; flourishing。          But the man he had consigned to death had
  been more than half of him; had been; indeed; his substance。                  Alone; with
  the power Overbury's talents had brought him; Somerset was bound to fail。
  The irony of it is that his downfall was contrived by a creature of his own
  raising。
  Somerset   had   appointed   Sir   Ralph   Winwood   to   the   office   of   First
  Secretary of State。       In that office word came to Winwood from Brussels
  that   new   light   had   been   thrown   on   the   mysterious   death   of   Sir   Thomas
  Overbury。       Winwood investigated in secret。           An English lad; one Reeves;
  an    apothecary's      assistant;   thinking    himself     dying;    had   confessed     at
  Flushing   that   Overbury   had   been   poisoned   by   an   injection   of   corrosive
  sublimate。      Reeves   himself   had   given   the   injection   on   the   orders   of   his
  master;   Loubel;   the   apothecary   who   had   attended   Overbury   on   the   day
  before his death。       Winwood sought out Loubel; and from him went to Sir
  Gervase Elwes。         The story he was able to make from what he had from
  the two men he took to the King。             From this beginning rose up the Great
  Oyer of Poisoning。         The matter was put into the hands of the Lord Chief
  Justice; Sir Edward Coke。
  The   lad   Reeves;  whose   confession had started the   matter;  was   either
  dead or dying abroad; and was so out of Coke's reach。                  But the man who
  had   helped   the   lad   to   administer   the   poisoned   clyster;   the   under…keeper
  Weston;      was   at  hand。    Weston     was    arrested;   and   examined      by  Coke。
  55
  … Page 56…
  SHE STANDS ACCUSED
  The statement Coke's bullying drew from the man made mention of one
  Franklin; another apothecary; as having supplied a phial which Sir Gervase
  Elwes   had   taken   and   thrown   away。      Weston   had   also   received   another
  phial   by   Franklin's   son   from   Lady   Essex。      This   also   Sir   Gervase   had
  taken   and   destroyed。     Then   there   had been   tarts   and   jellies supplied   by
  Mrs Turner。
  Coke had Mrs Turner and Franklin arrested; and after that Sir Gervase
  was   taken   as   an   accessory;   and   on   his   statement   that   he   had   employed
  Weston   on   Sir  Thomas   Monson's   recommendation   Sir Thomas   also   was
  roped in。     He maintained that he had been told to recommend Weston by
  Lady Essex and the Earl of Northampton。
  The next person to be examined by Coke was the apothecary Loubel;
  he who had attended Overbury on the day before his death。                      Though in
  his confession the lad Reeves said that he had been given money and sent
  abroad by Loubel; this was a matter that Coke did not probe。                 Loubel told
  Coke that he had given Overbury nothing but the physic prescribed by Sir
  Theodore Mayerne; the King's physician; and that in his opinion Overbury
  had   died of   consumption。        With   this   evidence  Coke  was   very  strangely
  contentor;   at   least;   content   as   far   as   Loubel   was   concerned;   for   this
  witness was not summoned again。
  Other   persons   were   examined   by   Coke;   notably   Overbury's   servant
  Davies and his secretary Payton。            Their statements served to throw some
  suspicion on the Earl of Somerset。
  But if all the detail of  these examinations were gone into we  should
  never   be   done。    Our   concern   is   with   the   two   women   involved;   Anne
  Turner   and   the   Countess   of   Somerset;   as   we   must   now   call   her。   I   am
  going to quote; however; two paragraphs from Rafael Sabatini's romance
  The Minion that I think may explain why it is so difficult to come to the
  truth of the Overbury mystery。            They indicate how it was smothered by
  the way in which Coke rough…handled justice throughout the whole series
  of trials。
  On October 19th; at the Guildhall; began the Great Oyer of Poisoning;
  as Coke described it; with the trial of Richard Weston。
  Thus at the very outset the dishonesty of the proceedings is apparent。
  56
  … Page 57…
  SHE STANDS ACCUSED
  Weston   was   an   accessory。       Both   on   his   own   evidence   and   that   of   Sir
  Gervase   Elwes;   besides   the   apothecary's         boy   in   Flushing;   Sir   Thomas
  Overbury       had   died   following     upon    an   injection    prepared    by   Loubel。
  Therefore   Loubel   was   the   principal;   and   only   after   Loubel's   conviction
  could the field have been extended to include Weston and the others。                     But
  Loubel was tried neither then nor subsequently; a circumstance regarded
  by many as the most mysterious part of what is known as the Overbury
  mystery; whereas; in fact; it is the clue to it。          Nor was the evidence of the
  coroner   put   in;   so   that   there   was   no   real   preliminary   formal   proof   that
  Overbury had been poisoned at all。
  Here   Mr   Sabatini   is   concerned      to   develop    one   of   the   underlying
  arguments of his storynamely; that it was King James himself who had
  ultimately      engineered     the   death    of  Sir   Thomas      Overbury。      It   is  an
  argument   which   I   would   not   attempt   to   refute。     I   do   not   think   that   Mr
  Sabatini's acumen has failed him in the least。              But the point for me in the
  paragraphs is the indication they give of how much Coke did to suppress
  all evidence that did not suit his purpose。
  Weston's trial is curious in that at first he refused to plead。                It is the
  first   instance   I   have   met   with in   history  of   a   prisoner standing   ‘mute   of
  malice。'     Coke read him a lecture on the subject; pointing out that by his
  obstinacy   he   was   making   himself   liable   to   peine   forte   et   dure;   which
  meant that order could be given for his exposure in an open place near the
  prison; extended naked; and to have weights laid upon him in increasing
  amount; he being kept alive with the ‘‘coarsest bread obtainable and water
  from the nearest sink or puddle to the place of execution; that day he had
  water having no bread; and that day he had bread having no water。''                      One
  may imagine with what grim satisfaction Coke ladled this out。                     It had its
  effect on Weston。
  He confessed that Mrs Turner had promised to give him a reward if he
  would poison Sir Thomas Overbury。                In May she had sent him a phial of
  ‘‘rosalgar;''   and   he   had   received   from   her   tarts   poisoned   with   mercury
  sublimate。      He was charged with having; at Mrs Turner's instance; joined
  with     an  apothecary's      boy   in   administering      an   injection    of  corrosive
  sublimate   to   Sir   Thomas   Overbury;   from   which   the   latter   died。       Coke's
  57