under　those　who　were　forced　to　submit　to　the　yoke　of　a　government　by
  constraint；　have　always　a　right　to　shake　it　off；　and　free　themselves
  from　the　usurpation　or　tyranny　the　sword　hath　brought　in　upon　them；
  till　their　rulers　put　them　under　such　a　frame　of　government　as　they
  willingly　and　of　choice　consent　to　（which　they　can　never　be　supposed
  to　do；　till　either　they　are　put　in　a　full　state　of　liberty　to　choose
  their　government　and　governors；　or　at　least　till　they　have　such
  standing　laws　to　which　they　have；　by　themselves　or　their
  representatives；　given　their　free　consent；　and　also　till　they　are
  allowed　their　due　property；　which　is　so　to　be　proprietors　of　what　they
  have　that　nobody　can　take　away　any　part　of　it　without　their　own
  consent；　without　which；　men　under　any　government　are　not　in　the
  state　of　free　men；　but　are　direct　slaves　under　the　force　of　war）。
  And　who　doubts　but　the　Grecian　Christians；　descendants　of　the
  ancient　possessors　of　that　country；　may　justly　cast　off　the　Turkish
  yoke　they　have　so　long　groaned　under；　whenever　they　have　a　power　to　do
  it？
  193。　But　granting　that　the　conqueror；　in　a　just　war；　has　a　right
  to　the　estates；　as　well　as　power　over　the　persons　of　the　conquered；
  which；　it　is　plain；　he　hath　not；　nothing　of　absolute　power　will　follow
  from　hence　in　the　continuance　of　the　government。　Because　the
  descendants　of　these　being　all　free　men；　if　he　grants　them　estates　and
  possessions　to　inhabit　his　country；　without　which　it　would　be　worth
  nothing；　whatsoever　he　grants　them　they　have　so　far　as　it　is　granted
  property　in；　the　nature　whereof　is；　that；　without　a　man's　own　consent；
  it　cannot　be　taken　from　him。
  194。　Their　persons　are　free　by　a　native　right；　and　their　properties；
  be　they　more　or　less；　are　their　own；　and　at　their　own　dispose；　and　not
  at　his；　or　else　it　is　no　property。　Supposing　the　conqueror　gives　to
  one　man　a　thousand　acres；　to　him　and　his　heirs　for　ever；　to　another　he
  lets　a　thousand　acres；　for　his　life；　under　the　rent　of　L50　or　L500　per
  annum。　Has　not　the　one　of　these　a　right　to　his　thousand　acres　for
  ever；　and　the　other　during　his　life；　paying　the　said　rent？　And　hath
  not　the　tenant　for　life　a　property　in　all　that　he　gets　over　and
  above　his　rent；　by　his　labour　and　industry；　during　the　said　term；
  supposing　it　be　double　the　rent？　Can　any　one　say；　the　king；　or
  conqueror；　after　his　grant；　may；　by　his　power　of　conqueror；　take
  away　all；　or　part　of　the　land；　from　the　heirs　of　one；　or　from　the
  other　during　his　life；　he　paying　the　rent？　Or；　can　he　take　away　from
  either　the　goods　or　money　they　have　got　upon　the　said　land　at　his
  pleasure？　If　he　can；　then　all　free　and　voluntary　contracts　cease；
  and　are　void　in　the　world；　there　needs　nothing　but　power　enough　to
  dissolve　them　at　any　time；　and　all　the　grants　and　promises　of　men　in
  power　are　but　mockery　and　collusion。　For　can　there　be　anything　more
  ridiculous　than　to　say；　I　give　you　and　yours　this　for　ever；　and　that
  in　the　surest　and　most　solemn　way　of　conveyance　can　be　devised；　and
  yet　it　is　to　be　understood　that　I　have　right；　if　I　please；　to　take
  it　away　from　you　again　to…morrow？
  195。　I　will　not　dispute　now　whether　princes　are　exempt　from　the　laws
  of　their　country；　but　this　I　am　sure；　they　owe　subjection　to　the
  laws　of　God　and　Nature。　Nobody；　no　power　can　exempt　them　from　the
  obligations　of　that　eternal　law。　Those　are　so　great　and　so　strong　in
  the　case　of　promises；　that　Omnipotency　itself　can　be　tied　by　them。
  Grants；　promises；　and　oaths　are　bonds　that　hold　the　Almighty；　whatever
  some　flatterers　say　to　princes　of　the　world；　who；　all　together；　with
  all　their　people　joined　to　them；　are；　in　comparison　of　the　great
  God；　but　as　a　drop　of　the　bucket；　or　a　dust　on　the　balance…
  inconsiderable；　nothing！
  196。　The　short　of　the　case　in　conquest；　is　this：　The　conqueror；　if
  he　have　a　just　cause；　has　a　despotical　right　over　the　persons　of　all
  that　actually　aided　and　concurred　in　the　war　against　him；　and　a
  right　to　make　up　his　damage　and　cost　out　of　their　labour　and
  estates；　so　he　injure　not　the　right　of　any　other。　Over　the　rest　of　the
  people；　if　there　were　any　that　consented　not　to　the　war；　and　over
  the　children　of　the　captives　themselves　or　the　possessions　of　either
  he　has　no　power；　and　so　can　have；　by　virtue　of　conquest；　no　lawful
  title　himself　to　dominion　over　them；　or　derive　it　to　his　posterity；
  but　is　an　aggressor；　and　puts　himself　in　a　state　of　war　against
  them；　and　has　no　better　a　right　of　principality；　he；　nor　any　of　his
  successors；　than　Hingar；　or　Hubba；　the　Danes；　had　here　in　England；
  or　Spartacus；　had　be　conquered　Italy；　which　is　to　have　their　yoke　cast
  off　as　soon　as　God　shall　give　those　under　their　subjection　courage　and
  opportunity　to　do　it。　Thus；　notwithstanding　whatever　title　the　kings
  of　Assyria　had　over　Judah；　by　the　sword；　God　assisted　Hezekiah　to
  throw　off　the　dominion　of　that　conquering　empire。　〃And　the　Lord　was
  with　Hezekiah；　and　he　prospered；　wherefore　he　went　forth；　and　he
  rebelled　against　the　king　of　Assyria；　and　served　him　not〃　（II　Kings
  18。　7）。　Whence　it　is　plain　that　shaking　off　a　power　which　force；　and
  not　right；　hath　set　over　any　one；　though　it　hath　the　name　of
  rebellion；　yet　is　no　offence　before　God；　but　that　which　He　allows
  and　countenances；　though　even　promises　and　covenants；　when　obtained　by
  force；　have　intervened。　For　it　is　very　probable；　to　any　one　that　reads
  the　story　of　Ahaz　and　Hezekiah　attentively；　that　the　Assyrians　subdued
  Ahaz；　and　deposed　him；　and　made　Hezekiah　king　in　his　father's
  lifetime；　and　that　Hezekiah；　by　agreement；　had　done　him　homage；　and
  paid　him　tribute　till　this　time。
  Chapter　XVII
  Of　Usurpation
  197。　As　conquest　may　be　called　a　foreign　usurpation；　so　usurpation
  is　a　kind　of　domestic　conquest；　with　this　difference…　that　an
  usurper　can　never　have　right　on　his　side；　it　being　no　usurpation　but
  where　one　is　got　into　the　possession　of　what　another　has　right　to。
  This；　so　far　as　it　is　usurpation；　is　a　change　only　of　persons；　but　not
  of　the　forms　and　rules　of　the　government；　for　if　the　usurper　extend
  his　power　beyond　what；　of　right；　belonged　to　the　lawful　princes　or
  governors　of　the　commonwealth；　it　is　tyranny　added　to　usurpation。
  198。　In　all　lawful　governments　the　designation　of　the　persons　who
  are　to　bear　rule　being　as　natural　and　necessary　a　part　as　the　form
  of　the　government　itself；　and　that　which　had　its　establishment
  originally　from　the　people…　the　anarchy　being　much　alike；　to　have　no
  form　of　government　at　all；　or　to　agree　that　it　shall　be　monarchical；
  yet　appoint　no　way　to　design　the　person　that　shall　have　the　power
  and　be　the　monarch…　all　commonwealths；　therefore；　with　the　form　of
  government　established；　have　rules　also　of　appointing　and　conveying
  the　right　to　those　who　are　to　have　any　share　in　the　public
  authority；　and　whoever　gets　into　the　exercise　of　any　part　of　the　power
  by　other　ways　than　what　the　laws　of　the　community　have　prescribed　hath
  no　right　to　be　obeyed；　though　the　form　of　the　commonwealth　be　still
  preserved；　since　he　is　not　the　person　the　laws　have　appointed；　and；
  consequently；　not　the　person　the　people　have　consented　to。　Nor　can
  such　an　usurper；　or　any　deriving　from　him；　ever　have　a　title　till
  the　people　are　both　at　liberty　to　consent；　and　have　actually
  consented；　to　allow　and　confirm　in　him　the　power　he　hath　till　then
  usurped。
  Chapter　XVIII
  Of　Tyranny
  199。　As　usurpation　is　the　exercise　of　power　which　another　hath　a
  right　to；　so　tyranny　is　the　exercise　of　power　beyond　right；　which
  nobody　can　have　a　right　to；　and　this　is　making　use　of　the　power　any
  one　has　in　his　hands；　not　for　the　good　of　those　who　are　under　it；
  but　for　his　own　private；　separate　advantage。　When　the　governor；
  however　entitled；　makes　not　the　law；　but　his　will；　the　rule；　and　his
  commands　and　actions　are　not　directed　to　the　preservation　of　the
  properties　of　his　people；　but　the　satisfaction　of　his　own　ambition；
  revenge；　covetousness；　or　any　other　irregular　passion。
  200。　If　one　can　doubt　this　to　be　truth　or　reason　because　it　comes
  from　the　obscure　hand　of　a　subject；　I　hope　the　authority　of　a　king
  will　make　it　pass　with　him。　King　James；　in　his　speech　to　the
  Parliament；　16O3；　tells　them　thus：　〃I　will　ever　prefer　the　weal　of　the
  public　and　of　the　whole　commonwealth；　in　making　of　good　laws　and
  constitutions；　to　any　particular　and　private　ends　of　mine；　thinking
  ever　the　wealth　and　weal　of　the　commonwealth　to　be　my　greatest　weal
  and　worldly　felicity…　a　point　wherein　a　lawful　king　doth　directly
  differ　from　a　tyrant；　for　I　do　acknowledge　that　the　special　and
  greatest　point　of　difference　that　is　between　a　rightful　king　and　an
  usurping　tyrant　is　this…　that　whereas　the　proud　and　ambitious　tyrant
  doth　think　his　kingdom　and　people　are　only　ordained　for　satisfaction
  of　his　desires　and　unreasonable　appetites；　the　righteous　and　just　king
  doth；　by　the　contrary；　acknowledge　himself　to　be　ordained　for　the
  procuring　of　the　wealth　and　property　of　his　people。〃　And　again；　in　his
  sp