able；　and　succeeded　in　leaving　the　table　without　being　called　upon　to
  decide　the　point。　　Caumartin；　who　saw　his　embarrassment；　ran　to　him；　and
  kindly　whispered　in　his　ear　that　Moses　was　the　author　of　the　Lord's
  Prayer。　　Thus　strengthened；　Breteuil　returned　to　the　attack；　brought；
  while　taking　coffee；　the　conversation　back　again　to　the　bet；　and；　after
  reproaching　Madame　de　Pontchartrain　for　supposing　him　ignorant　upon　such
  a　point；　and　declaring　he　was　ashamed　of　being　obliged　to　say　such　a
  trivial　thing；　pronounced　emphatically　that　it　was　Moses　who　had　written
  the　Lord's　Prayer。　　The　burst　of　laughter　that；　of　course；　followed　this；
  overwhelmed　him　with　confusion。　　Poor　Breteuil　was　for　a　long　time　at
  loggerheads　with　his　friend；　and　the　Lord's　Prayer　became　a　standing
  reproach　to　him。
  He　had　a　friend；　the　Marquis　de　Gesvres；　who；　upon　some　points；　was　not
  much　better　informed。　　Talking　one　day　in　the　cabinet　of　the　King；　and
  admiring　in　the　tone　of　a　connoisseur　some　fine　paintings　of　the
  Crucifixion　by　the　first　masters；　he　remarked　that　they　were　all　by　one
  hand。
  He　was　laughed　at；　and　the　different　painters　were　named；　as　recognized
  by　their　style。
  〃Not　at　all；〃　said　the　Marquis；　〃the　painter　is　called　INRI；　do　you　not
  see　his　name　upon　all　the　pictures？　　What　followed　after　such　gross
  stupidity　and　ignorance　may　be　imagined。
  At　the　end　of　this　year　the　King　resolved　to　undertake　three　grand
  projects；　which　ought　to　have　been　carried　out　long　before：　the　chapel　of
  Versailles；　the　Church　of　the　Invalides；　and　the　altar　of　Notre…Dame　de
  Paris。　　This　last　was　a　vow　of　Louis　XIII。；　made　when；　he　no　longer　was
  able　to　accomplish　it；　and　which　he　had　left　to　his　successor；　who　had
  been　more　than　fifty　years　without　thinking　of　it。
  On　the　6th　of　January；　upon　the　reception　of　the　ambassadors　at　the　house
  of　the　Duchesse　de　Bourogogne；　an　adventure　happened　which　I　will　here
  relate。　　M。　de　Lorraine　belonged　to　a　family　which　had　been　noted　for　its
  pretensions；　and　for　the　disputes　of　precedency　in　which　it　engaged。　　He
  was　as　prone　to　this　absurdity　as　the　rest；　and　on　this　occasion　incited
  the　Princesse　d'Harcourt；　one　of　his　relations；　to　act　in　a　manner　that
  scandalised　all　the　Court。　　Entering　the　room　in　which　the　ambassadors
  were　to　be　received　and　where　a　large　number　of　ladies　were　already
  collected；　she　glided　behind　the　Duchesse　de　Rohan；　and　told　her　to　pass
  to　the　left。　　The　Duchesse　de　Rohan；　much　surprised；　replied　that　she　was
  very　well　placed　already。　　Whereupon；　the　Princesse　d'Harcourt；　who　was
  tall　and　strong；　made　no　further　ado；　but　with　her　two　arms　seized　the
  Duchesse　de　Rohan；　turned　her　round；　and　sat　down　in　her　place。　　All　the
  ladies　were　strangely　scandalised　at　this；　but　none　dared　say　a　word；　not
  even　Madame　de　Lude；　lady　in　waiting　on　the　Duchesse　de　Bourgogne；　who；
  for　her　part　also；　felt　the　insolence　of　the　act；　but　dared　not　speak；
  being　so　young。　　As　for　the　Duchesse　de　Rohan；　feeling　that　opposition
  must　lead　to　fisticuffs；　she　curtseyed　to　the　Duchess；　and　quietly
  retired　to　another　place。　　A　few　minutes　after　this；　Madame　de　Saint…
  Simon；　who　was　then　with　child；　feeling　herself　unwell；　and　tired　of
  standing；　seated　herself　upon　the　first　cushion　she　could　find。　　It　so
  happened；　that　in　the　position　she　thus　occupied；　she　had　taken
  precedence　of　Madame　d'Armagnac　by　two　degrees。　　Madame　d'Armagnac；；
  perceiving　it；　spoke　to　her　upon　the　subject。　　Madame　de　Saint…Simon；　who
  had　only　placed　herself　there　for　a　moment；　did　not　reply；　but　went
  elsewhere。
  As　soon　as　I　learnt　of　the　first　adventure；　I　thought　it　important　that
  such　an　insult　should　not　be　borne；　and　I　went　and　conferred　with　M。　de
  la　Rochefoucauld　upon　the　subject；　at　the　same　time　that　Marechal　de
  Boufflers　spoke　of　it　to　M。　de　Noailles。　　I　called　upon　other　of　my
  friends；　and　the　opinion　was　that　the　Duc　de　Rohan　should　complain　to　the
  King　on　the　morrow　of　the　treatment　his　wife　had　received。
  In　the　evening　while　I　was　at　the　King's　supper；　I　was　sent　for　by　Madame
  de　Saint…Simon；　who　informed　me　that　the　Lorraines；　afraid　of　the
  complaints　that　would　probably　be　addressed　to　the　King　upon　what　had
  taken　place　between　the　Princesse　d'Harcourt　and　the　Duchesse　de　Rohan；
  had　availed　themselves　of　what　happened　between　Madame　de　Saint…Simon　and
  Madame　d'Armagnac；　in　order　to　be　the　first　to　complain；　so　that　one
  might　balance　the　other。　　Here　was　a　specimen　of　the　artifice　of　these
  gentlemen；　which　much　enraged　me。　　On　the　instant　I　determined　to　lose　no
  time　in　speaking　to　the　King；　and　that　very　evening　I　related　what　had
  occurred；　in　so　far　as　Madame　de　Saint…Simon　was　concerned；　but　made　no
  allusion　to　M。　de　Rohan's　affair；　thinking　it　best　to　leave　that　to　be
  settled　by　itself　on　the　morrow。　　The　King　replied　to　me　very　graciously；
  and　I　retired；　after　assuring　him　that　all　I　had　said　was　true　from
  beginning　to　end。
  The　next　day　the　Duc　de　Rohan　made　his　complaint。　　The　King；　who　had
  already　been　fully　informed　of　the　matter；　received　him　well；　praised　the
  respect　and　moderation　of　Madame　de　Rohan；　declared　Madame　d'Harcourt　to
  have　been　very　impertinent；　and　said　some　very　hard　words　upon　the
  Lorraines。
  I　found　afterwards；　that　Madame　de　Maintenon；　who　much　favoured　Madame
  d'Harcourt；　had　all　the　trouble　in　the　world　to　persuade　the　King　not　to
  exclude　her　from　the　next　journey　to　Marly。　　She　received　a　severe
  reprimand　from　the　King；　a　good　scolding　from　Madame　de　Maintenon；　and
  was　compelled　publicly　to　ask　pardon　of　the　Duchesse　de　Rohan。　　This　she
  did；　but　with　a　crawling　baseness　equal　to　her　previous　audacity。　　Such
  was　the　end　of　this　strange　history。
  There　appeared　at　this　time　a　book　entitled　〃Probleme；〃　but　without　name
  of　author；　and　directed　against　M。　de　Paris；　declaring　that　he　had
  uttered　sentiments　favourable　to　the　Jansenists　being　at　Chalons；　and
  unfavourable　being　at　Paris。　　The　book　came　from　the　Jesuits；　who　could
  not　pardon　M。　de　Paris　for　having　become　archbishop　without　their
  assistance。　　It　was　condemned　and　burnt　by　decree　of　the　Parliament；　and
  the　Jesuits　had　to　swallow　all　the　shame　of　it。　　The　author　was　soon
  after　discovered。　　He　was　named　Boileau；　not　the　friend　of　Bontems；　who
  so　often　preached　before　the　King；　and　still　less　the　celebrated　poet　and
  author　of　the　'Flagellants'；　but　a　doctor　of　much　wit　and　learning　whom
  M。　de　Paris　had　taken　into　his　favour　and　treated　like　a　brother。　　Who
  would　have　believed　that　〃Probleme〃　could　spring　from　such　a　man？　　M。　de
  Paris　was　much　hurt；　but　instead　of　imprisoning　Boileau　for　the　rest　of
  his　days；　as　he　might　have　done；　he　acted　the　part　of　a　great　bishop；　and
  gave　him　a　good　canonical　of　Saint　Honore；　which　became　vacant　a　few　days
  afterwards。　　Boileau；　who　was　quite　without　means；　completed　his
  dishonour　by　accepting　it。
  The　honest　people　of　the　Court　regretted　a　cynic　who　died　at　this　time；
  I　mean　the　Chevalier　de　Coislin。　　He　was　a　most　extraordinary　man；　very
  splenetic；　and　very　difficult　to　deal　with。　　He　rarely　left　Versailles；
  and　never　went　to　see　the　king。　　I　have　seen　him　get　out　of　the　way　not
  to　meet　him。　　He　lived　with　Cardinal　Coislin；　his　brother。　　If　anybody
  displeased　him；　he　would　go　and　sulk　in　his　own　room；　and　if；　whilst　at
  table；　any　one　came　whom　he　did　not　like；　he　would　throw　away　his　plate；
  go　off　to　sulk；　or　to　finish　his　dinner　all　alone。　　One　circumstance　will
  paint　him　completely。　　Being　on　a　journey　once　with　his　brothers；　the　Duc
  de　Coislin　and　the　Cardinal　de　Coislin；　the　party　rested　for　the　night　at
  the　house　of　a　vivacious　and　very　pretty　bourgeoise。　　The　Duc　de　Coislin
  was　an　exceedingly　polite　man；　and　bestowed　amiable　compliments　and
  civilities　upon　their　hostess；　much　to　the　disgust　of　the　Chevalier。　　At
  parting；　the　Duke　renewed　the　politeness　he　had　displayed　so　abundantly
  the　previous　evening；　and　delayed　the　others　by　his　long…winded
  flatteries。　　When；　at　last；　they　left　the　house；　and　were　two　or　three
  leagues　away　from　it；　the　Chevalier　de　Coislin　said；　that；　in　spite　of
  all　this　politeness；　he　had　reason　to　believe　that　their　pretty　hostess
  would　not　long　be　pleased　with　the　Duke。　　The　Duke；　disturbed；　asked　his
  reason　for　thinking　so。　　〃Do　you　wish　to　learn　it？〃　said　the　Chevalier；
  〃well；　then；　you　must　know　that；　disgusted　by　your　compliments；　I　went　up
  into　the　bedroom　in　which　you　slept；　and　made　a　filthy　mess　on　the　floor；
  which　the　landlady　will　no　doubt　attribute　to　you；　despite　all　your　fine
  speeches。〃
  At　this　there　was　loud　laughter；　but　the　Duke　was　in　fury；　and　wished　to
  return　in　order　to　clear　up　his　character。　　Although　it　rained　hard；　they
  had　all　the　pains　in　the　world　to　hinder　him；　and　still　more　to　bring
  about　a　reconciliation。　　Nothing　was　more　pleasant　than　to　hear　the
  brothers　relate　this　adventure　each　in　his　own　way。
  Two　cruel　effects　of　gambling　were　noticed　at　this　time。　　Reineville；　a
  lieutenant　of　the　body…guard；　a　general　officer　distinguished　in　war；
  very　well　treated　by　the　King；　and　much　esteemed　by　the　captain　of　the
  Guards；　suddenly　disappeared；　and　could　not　be　found　anywhere；　although
  the　utmost　care　was　taken　to　search