nearly　the　same　they　were　two　hundred　years　ago：　But　what　a
  difference　is　there　in　the　power　and　grandeur　of　those　kingdoms？
  Which　can　be　ascribed　to　nothing　but　the　encrease　of　art　and
  industry。　When　CHARLES　VIII　of　FRANCE　invaded　ITALY；　he　carried
  with　him　about　20；000　men：　Yet　this　armament　so　exhausted　the
  nation；　as　we　learn　from　GUICCIARDIN；　that　for　some　years　it　was
  not　able　to　make　so　great　an　effort。　The　late　king　of　FRANCE；　in
  time　of　war；　kept　in　pay　above　400；000　men；　though　from
  MAZARINE'S　death　to　his　own；　he　was　engaged　in　a　course　of　wars
  that　lasted　near　thirty　years。
  This　industry　is　much　promoted　by　the　knowledge　inseparable
  from　ages　of　art　and　refinement；　as；　on　the　other　hand；　this
  knowledge　enables　the　public　to　make　the　best　advantage　of　the
  industry　of　its　subjects。　Laws；　order；　police；　discipline；　these
  can　never　be　carried　to　any　degree　of　perfection；　before　human
  reason　has　refined　itself　by　exercise；　and　by　an　application　to
  the　more　vulgar　arts；　at　least；　of　commerce　and　manufacture。　Can
  we　expect；　that　a　government　will　be　well　modelled　by　a　people；
  who　know　not　how　to　make　a　spinning…wheel；　or　to　employ　a　loom　to
  advantage？　Not　to　mention；　that　all　ignorant　ages　are　infested
  with　superstition；　which　throws　the　government　off　its　bias；　and
  disturbs　men　in　the　pursuit　of　their　interest　and　happiness。
  Knowledge　in　the　arts　of　government　naturally　begets　mildness
  and　moderation；　by　instructing　men　in　the　advantages　of　humane
  maxims　above　rigour　and　severity；　which　drive　subjects　into
  rebellion；　and　make　the　return　to　submission　impracticable；　by
  cutting　off　all　hopes　of　pardon。　When　the　tempers　of　men　are
  softened　as　well　as　their　knowledge　improved；　this　humanity
  appears　still　more　conspicuous；　and　is　the　chief　characteristic
  which　distinguishes　a　civilized　age　from　times　of　barbarity　and
  ignorance。　Factions　are　then　less　inveterate；　revolutions　less
  tragical；　authority　less　severe；　and　seditions　less　frequent。
  Even　foreign　wars　abate　of　their　cruelty；　and　after　the　field　of
  battle；　where　honour　and　interest　steel　men　against　compassion　as
  well　as　fear；　the　combatants　divest　themselves　of　the　brute；　and
  resume　the　man。
  Nor　need　we　fear；　that　men；　by　losing　their　ferocity；　will
  lose　their　martial　spirit；　or　become　less　undaunted　and　vigorous
  in　defence　of　their　country　or　their　liberty。　The　arts　have　no
  such　effect　in　enervating　either　the　mind　or　body。　On　the
  contrary；　industry；　their　inseparable　attendant；　adds　new　force
  to　both。　And　if　anger；　which　is　said　to　be　the　whetstone　of
  courage；　loses　somewhat　of　its　asperity；　by　politeness　and
  refinement；　a　sense　of　honour；　which　is　a　stronger；　more
  constant；　and　more　governable　principle；　acquires　fresh　vigour　by
  that　elevation　of　genius　which　arises　from　knowledge　and　a　good
  education。　Add　to　this；　that　courage　can　neither　have　any
  duration；　nor　be　of　any　use；　when　not　accompanied　with　discipline
  and　martial　skill；　which　are　seldom　found　among　a　barbarous
  people。　The　ancients　remarked；　that　DATAMES　was　the　only
  barbarian　that　ever　knew　the　art　of　war。　And　PYRRHUS；　seeing　the
  ROMANS　marshal　their　army　with　some　art　and　skill；　said　with
  surprize；　These　barbarians　have　nothing　barbarous　in　their
  discipline！　It　is　observable；　that；　as　the　old　ROMANS；　by
  applying　themselves　solely　to　war；　were　almost　the　only
  uncivilized　people　that　ever　possessed　military　discipline；　so
  the　modern　ITALIANS　are　the　only　civilized　people；　among
  EUROPEANS；　that　ever　wanted　courage　and　a　martial　spirit。　Those
  who　would　ascribe　this　effeminacy　of　the　ITALIANS　to　their
  luxury；　or　politeness；　or　application　to　the　arts；　need　but
  consider　the　FRENCH　and　ENGLISH；　whose　bravery　is　as
  uncontestable；　as　their　love　for　the　arts；　and　their　assiduity　in
  commerce。　The　ITALIAN　historians　give　us　a　more　satisfactory
  reason　for　this　degeneracy　of　their　countrymen。　They　shew　us　how
  the　sword　was　dropped　at　once　by　all　the　ITALIAN　sovereigns；
  while　the　VENETIAN　aristocracy　was　jealous　of　its　subjects；　the
  FLORENTINE　democracy　applied　itself　entirely　to　commerce；　ROME
  was　governed　by　priests；　and　NAPLES　by　women。　War　then　became　the
  business　of　soldiers　of　fortune；　who　spared　one　another；　and　to
  the　astonishment　of　the　world；　could　engage　a　whole　day　in　what
  they　called　a　battle；　and　return　at　night　to　their　camp；　without
  the　least　bloodshed。
  What　has　chiefly　induced　severe　moralists　to　declaim　against
  refinement　in　the　arts；　is　the　example　of　ancient　ROME；　which；
  joining；　to　its　poverty　and　rusticity；　virtue　and　public　spirit；
  rose　to　such　a　surprizing　height　of　grandeur　and　liberty；　but
  having　learned　from　its　conquered　provinces　the　ASIATIC　luxury；
  fell　into　every　kind　of　corruption；　whence　arose　sedition　and
  civil　wars；　attended　at　last　with　the　total　loss　of　liberty。　All
  the　LATIN　classics；　whom　we　peruse　in　our　infancy；　are　full　of
  these　sentiments；　and　universally　ascribe　the　ruin　of　their　state
  to　the　arts　and　riches　imported　from　the　East：　Insomuch　that
  SALLUST　represents　a　taste　for　painting　as　a　vice；　no　less　than
  lewdness　and　drinking。　And　so　popular　were　these　sentiments；
  during　the　later　ages　of　the　republic；　that　this　author　abounds
  in　praises　of　the　old　rigid　ROMAN　virtue；　though　himself　the　most
  egregious　instance　of　modern　luxury　and　corruption；　speaks
  contemptuously　of　the　GRECIAN　eloquence；　though　the　most　elegant
  writer　in　the　world；　nay；　employs　preposterous　digressions　and
  declamations　to　this　purpose；　though　a　model　of　taste　and
  correctness。
  But　it　would　be　easy　to　prove；　that　these　writers　mistook　the
  cause　of　the　disorders　in　the　ROMAN　state；　and　ascribed　to　luxury
  and　the　arts；　what　really　proceeded　from　an　ill　modelled
  government；　and　the　unlimited　extent　of　conquests。　Refinement　on
  the　pleasures　and　conveniencies　of　life　has　no　natural　tendency
  to　beget　venality　and　corruption。　The　value；　which　all　men　put
  upon　any　particular　pleasure；　depends　on　comparison　and
  experience；　nor　is　a　porter　less　greedy　of　money；　which　he　spends
  on　bacon　and　brandy；　than　a　courtier；　who　purchases　champagne　and
  ortolans。　Riches　are　valuable　at　all　times；　and　to　all　men；
  because　they　always　purchase　pleasures；　such　as　men　are
  accustomed　to；　and　desire：　Nor　can　any　thing　restrain　or　regulate
  the　love　of　money；　but　a　sense　of　honour　and　virtue；　which；　if　it
  be　not　nearly　equal　at　all　times；　will　naturally　abound　most　in
  ages　of　knowledge　and　refinement。
  Of　all　EUROPEAN　kingdoms；　POLAND　seems　the　most　defective　in
  the　arts　of　war　as　well　as　peace；　mechanical　as　well　as　liberal；
  yet　it　is　there　that　venality　and　corruption　do　most　prevail。　The
  nobles　seem　to　have　preserved　their　crown　elective　for　no　other
  purpose；　than　regularly　to　sell　it　to　the　highest　bidder。　This　is
  almost　the　only　species　of　commerce；　with　which　that　people　are
  acquainted。
  The　liberties　of　ENGLAND；　so　far　from　decaying　since　the
  improvements　in　the　arts；　have　never　flourished　so　much　as　during
  that　period。　And　though　corruption　may　seem　to　encrease　of　late
  years；　this　is　chiefly　to　be　ascribed　to　our　established　liberty；
  when　our　princes　have　found　the　impossibility　of　governing
  without　parliaments；　or　of　terrifying　parliaments　by　the　phantom
  of　prerogative。　Not　to　mention；　that　this　corruption　or　venality
  prevails　much　more　among　the　electors　than　the　elected；　and
  therefore　cannot　justly　be　ascribed　to　any　refinements　in　luxury。
  If　we　consider　the　matter　in　a　proper　light；　we　shall　find；
  that　a　progress　in　the　arts　is　rather　favourable　to　liberty；　and
  has　a　natural　tendency　to　preserve；　if　not　produce　a　free
  government。　In　rude　unpolished　nations；　where　the　arts　are
  neglected；　all　labour　is　bestowed　on　the　cultivation　of　the
  ground；　and　the　whole　society　is　divided　into　two　classes；
  proprietors　of　land；　and　their　vassals　or　tenants。　The　latter　are
  necessarily　dependent；　and　fitted　for　slavery　and　subjection；
  especially　where　they　possess　no　riches；　and　are　not　valued　for
  their　knowledge　in　agriculture；　as　must　always　be　the　case　where
  the　arts　are　neglected。　The　former　naturally　erect　themselves
  into　petty　tyrants；　and　must　either　submit　to　an　absolute　master；
  for　the　sake　of　peace　and　order；　or　if　they　will　preserve　their
  independency；　like　the　ancient　barons；　they　must　fall　into　feuds
  and　contests　among　themselves；　and　throw　the　whole　society　into
  such　confusion；　as　is　perhaps　worse　than　the　most　despotic
  government。　But　where　luxury　nourishes　commerce　and　industry；　the
  peasants；　by　a　proper　cultivation　of　the　land；　become　rich　and
  independent；　while　the　tradesmen　and　merchants　acquire　a　share　of
  the　property；　and　draw　authority　and　consideration　to　that
  middling　rank　of　men；　who　are　the　best　and　firmest　basis　of
  public　liberty。　These　submit　not　to　slavery；　like　the　peasants；
  from　poverty　and　meanness　of　spirit；　and　having　no　hopes　of
  tyrannizing　over　others；　like　the　barons；　they　are　not　tempted；
  for　the　sake　of　that　gratification；　to　submit　to　the　tyranny　of
  their　sovereign。　They　covet　equal　laws；　which　may　secure　their
  property；　and　preserve　them　from　monarchical；　as　well　as
  aristocratical　tyranny。
  The　lower　house　is　the　support　of　our　popu