第 3 节
作者:人生几何      更新:2021-02-19 20:56      字数:9321
  who would escape the censure of the world。 Now love ought to be for
  the advantage of both parties; and for the injury of neither。
  〃I believe that I have said enough; but if there is anything more
  which you desire or which in your opinion needs to be supplied; ask
  and I will answer。〃
  Now; Socrates; what do you think? Is not the discourse excellent;
  more especially in the matter of the language?
  Soc。 Yes; quite admirable; the effect on me was ravishing。 And
  this I owe to you; Phaedrus; for I observed you while reading to be in
  an ecstasy; and thinking that you are more experienced in these
  matters than I am; I followed your example; and; like you; my divine
  darling; I became inspired with a phrenzy。
  Phaedr。 Indeed; you are pleased to be merry。
  Soc。 Do you mean that I am not in earnest?
  Phaedr。 Now don't talk in that way; Socrates; but let me have your
  real opinion; I adjure you; by Zeus; the god of friendship; to tell me
  whether you think that any Hellene could have said more or spoken
  better on the same subject。
  Soc。 Well; but are you and I expected to praise the sentiments of
  the author; or only the clearness; and roundness; and finish; and
  tournure of the language? As to the first I willingly submit to your
  better judgment; for I am not worthy to form an opinion; having only
  attended to the rhetorical manner; and I was doubting whether this
  could have been defended even by Lysias himself; I thought; though I
  speak under correction; that he repeated himself two or three times;
  either from want of words or from want of pains; and also; he appeared
  to me ostentatiously to exult in showing how well he could say the
  same thing in two or three ways。
  Phaedr。 Nonsense; Socrates; what you call repetition was the
  especial merit of the speech; for he omitted no topic of which the
  subject rightly allowed; and I do not think that any one could have
  spoken better or more exhaustively。
  Soc。 There I cannot go along with you。 Ancient sages; men and women;
  who have spoken and written of these things; would rise up in judgment
  against me; if out of complaisance I assented to you。
  Phaedr。 Who are they; and where did you hear anything better than
  this?
  Soc。 I am sure that I must have heard; but at this moment I do not
  remember from whom; perhaps from Sappho the fair; or Anacreon the
  wise; or; possibly; from a prose writer。 Why do I say so? Why; because
  I perceive that my bosom is full; and that I could make another speech
  as good as that of Lysias; and different。 Now I am certain that this
  is not an invention of my own; who am well aware that I know
  nothing; and therefore I can only infer that I have been filled
  through the cars; like a pitcher; from the waters of another; though I
  have actually forgotten in my stupidity who was my informant。
  Phaedr。 That is grand:…but never mind where you beard the
  discourse or from whom; let that be a mystery not to be divulged
  even at my earnest desire。 Only; as you say; promise to make another
  and better oration; equal in length and entirely new; on the same
  subject; and I; like the nine Archons; will promise to set up a golden
  image at Delphi; not only of myself; but of you; and as large as life。
  Soc。 You are a dear golden ass if you suppose me to mean that Lysias
  has altogether missed the mark; and that I can make a speech from
  which all his arguments are to be excluded。 The worst of authors
  will say something which is to the point。 Who; for example; could
  speak on this thesis of yours without praising the discretion of the
  non…lover and blaming the indiscretion of the lover? These are the
  commonplaces of the subject which must come in (for what else is there
  to be said?) and must be allowed and excused; the only merit is in the
  arrangement of them; for there can be none in the invention; but
  when you leave the commonplaces; then there may be some originality。
  Phaedr。 I admit that there is reason in what you say; and I too will
  be reasonable; and will allow you to start with the premiss that the
  lover is more disordered in his wits than the non…lover; if in what
  remains you make a longer and better speech than Lysias; and use other
  arguments; then I say again; that a statue you shall have of beaten
  gold; and take your place by the colossal offerings of the Cypselids
  at Olympia。
  Soc。 How profoundly in earnest is the lover; because to tease him
  I lay a finger upon his love! And so; Phaedrus; you really imagine
  that I am going to improve upon the ingenuity of Lysias?
  Phaedr。 There I have you as you had me; and you must just speak
  〃as you best can。〃 Do not let us exchange 〃tu quoque〃 as in a farce;
  or compel me to say to you as you said to me; 〃I know Socrates as well
  as I know myself; and he was wanting to; speak; but he gave himself
  airs。〃 Rather I would have you consider that from this place we stir
  not until you have unbosomed yourself of the speech; for here are we
  all alone; and I am stronger; remember; and younger than you…Wherefore
  perpend; and do not compel me to use violence。
  Soc。 But; my sweet Phaedrus; how ridiculous it would be of me to
  compete with Lysias in an extempore speech! He is a master in his
  art and I am an untaught man。
  Phaedr。 You see how matters stand; and therefore let there be no
  more pretences; for; indeed; I know the word that is irresistible。
  Soc。 Then don't say it。
  Phaedr。 Yes; but I will; and my word shall be an oath。 〃I say; or
  rather swear〃…but what god will be witness of my oath?…〃By this
  plane…tree I swear; that unless you repeat the discourse here in the
  face of this very plane…tree; I will never tell you another; never let
  you have word of another!〃
  Soc。 Villain I am conquered; the poor lover of discourse has no more
  to say。
  Phaedr。 Then why are you still at your tricks?
  Soc。 I am not going to play tricks now that you have taken the oath;
  for I cannot allow myself to be starved。
  Phaedr。 Proceed。
  Soc。 Shall I tell you what I will do?
  Phaedr。 What?
  Soc。 I will veil my face and gallop through the discourse as fast as
  I can; for if I see you I shall feel ashamed and not know what to say。
  Phaedr。 Only go on and you may do anything else which you please。
  Soc。 Come; O ye Muses; melodious; as ye are called; whether you have
  received this name from the character of your strains; or because
  the Melians are a musical race; help; O help me in the tale which my
  good friend here desires me to rehearse; in order that his friend whom
  he always deemed wise may seem to him to be wiser than ever。
  Once upon a time there was a fair boy; or; more properly speaking; a
  youth; he was very fair and had a great many lovers; and there was one
  special cunning one; who had persuaded the youth that he did not
  love him; but he really loved him all the same; and one day when he
  was paying his addresses to him; he used this very argument…that he
  ought to accept the non…lover rather than the lover; his words were as
  follows:…
  〃All good counsel begins in the same way; a man should know what
  he is advising about; or his counsel will all come to nought。 But
  people imagine that they know about the nature of things; when they
  don't know about them; and; not having come to an understanding at
  first because they think that they know; they end; as might be
  expected; in contradicting one another and themselves。 Now you and I
  must not be guilty of this fundamental error which we condemn in
  others; but as our question is whether the lover or non…lover is to be
  preferred; let us first of all agree in defining the nature and
  power of love; and then; keeping our eyes upon the definition and to
  this appealing; let us further enquire whether love brings advantage
  or disadvantage。
  〃Every one sees that love is a desire; and we know also that
  non…lovers desire the beautiful and good。 Now in what way is the lover
  to be distinguished from the non…lover? Let us note that in every
  one of us there are two guiding and ruling principles which lead us
  whither they will; one is the natural desire of pleasure; the other is
  an acquired opinion which aspires after the best; and these two are
  sometimes in harmony and then again at war; and sometimes the one;
  sometimes the other conquers。 When opinion by the help of reason leads
  us to the best; the conquering principle is called temperance; but
  when desire; which is devoid of reason; rules in us and drags