第 9 节
作者:
翱翔1981 更新:2021-02-19 18:34 字数:9322
of Marah the water which feeds the roots of all evil。
The necessity of these laws of distribution or restraint is
curiously over…looked in the ordinary political economist's
definition of his own 〃science。〃 He calls it; shortly; the
〃science of getting rich。〃 But there are many sciences; as well
as many arts; of getting rich。 Poisoning people of large estates;
was one employed largely in the middle ages; adulteration of food
of people of small estates; is one employed largely now。 The
ancient and honourable Highland method of blackmail; the more
modern and less honourable system of obtaining goods on credit;
and the other variously improved methods of appropriation
which; in major and minor scales of industry; down to the most
artistic pocket…picking; we owe to recent genius; all come
under the general head of sciences; or arts; of getting rich。
So that it is clear the popular economist; in calling his
science the science par excellence of getting rich; must attach
some peculiar ideas of limitation to its character。 I hope I do
not misrepresent him; by assuming that he means his science to be
the science of 〃getting rich by legal or just means。〃 In this
definition; is the word 〃just;〃 or 〃legal;〃 finally to stand? For
it is possible among certain nations; or under certain rulers; or
by help of certain advocates; that proceedings may be legal which
are by no means just。 If; therefore; we leave at last only the
word 〃just〃 in that place of our definition; the insertion of
this solitary and small word will make a notable difference in
the grammar of our science。 For then it will follow that; in
order to grow rich scientifically; we must grow rich justly; and;
therefore; know what is just; so that our economy will no longer
depend merely on prudence; but on jurisprudence and that of
divine; not human law。 Which prudence is indeed of no mean order;
holding itself; as it were; high in the air of heaven; and gazing
for ever on the light of the sun of justice; hence the souls
which have excelled in it are represented by Dante as stars;
forming in heaven for ever the figure of the eye of an eagle:
they having been in life the discerners of light from darkness;
or to the whole human race; as the light of the body; which is
the eye; while those souls which form the wings of the bird
(giving power and dominion to justice; 〃healing in its wings〃)
trace also in light the inscription in heaven: 〃DILIGITE
JUSTITIAM QUI JUDICATIS TERRAM。〃 〃Ye who judge the earth; give〃
(not; observe; merely love; but) 〃diligent love to justice:〃 the
love which seeks diligently; that is to say; choosingly; and by
preference; to all things else。 Which judging or doing judgment
in the earth is; according to their capacity and position;
required not of judges only; nor of rulers only; but of all
men:(7*) a truth sorrowfully lost sight of even by those who are
ready enough to apply to themselves passages in which Christian
men are spoken of as called to be 〃saints〃 (i。e。 to helpful or
healing functions); and 〃chosen to be kings〃 (i。e。 to knowing or
directing functions); the true meaning of these titles having
been long lost through the pretences of unhelpful and unable
persons to saintly and kingly character; also through the once
popular idea that both the sanctity and royalty are to consist in
wearing long robes and high crowns; instead of in mercy and
judgment; whereas all true sanctity is saving power; as all true
royalty is ruling power; and injustice is part and parcel of the
denial of such power; which 〃makes men as the creeping things; as
the fishes of the sea; that have no ruler over them。〃(8*)
Absolute justice is indeed no more attainable than absolute
truth; but the righteous man is distinguished from the
unrighteous by his desire and hope of justice; as the true man
from the false by his desire and hope of truth。 And though
absolute justice be unattainable; as much justice as we need for
all practical use is attainable by all those who make it their
aim。
We have to examine; then; in the subject before us; what are
the laws of justice respecting payment of labour no small
part; these; of the foundations of all jurisprudence。
I reduced; in my last paper; the idea of money payment to its
simplest or radical terms。 In those terms its nature; and the
conditions of justice respecting it; can be best ascertained。
Money payment; as there stated; consists radically in a
promise to some person working for us; that for the time and
labour he spends in our service to…day we will give or procure
equivalent time and labour in his service at any future time when
he may demand it。(9*)
If we promise to give him less labour than he has given us;
we under…pay him。 If we promise to give him more labour than he
has given us; we over…pay him。 In practice; according to the laws
of demand and supply; when two men are ready to do the work; and
only one man wants to have it done; the two men underbid each
other for it; and the one who gets it to do; is under…paid。 But
when two men want the work done; and there is only one man ready
to do it; the two men who want it done over…bid each other; and
the workman is over…paid。
I will examine these two points of injustice in succession;
but first I wish the reader to clearly understand the central
principle; lying between the two; of right or just payment。
When we ask a service of any man; he may either give it us
freely; or demand payment for it。 Respecting free gift of
service; there is no question at present; that being a matter of
affection not of traffic。 But if he demand payment for it; and
we wish to treat him with absolute equity; it is evident that
this equity can only consist in giving time for time; strength
for strength; and skill for skill。 If a man works an hour for us;
and we only promise to work half…an…hour for him in return; we
obtain an unjust advantage。 If; on the contrary; we promise to
work an hour and a half for him in return; he has an unjust
advantage。 The justice consists in absolute exchange; or; if
there be any respect to the stations of the parties; it will not
be in favour of the employer: there is certainly no equitable
reason in a main's being poor; that if he give me a pound of
bread to…day; I should return him less than a pound of bread
to…morrow; or any equitable reason in a man's being uneducated;
that if he uses a certain quantity of skill and knowledge in my
service; I should use a less quantity of skill and knowledge in
his。 Perhaps; ultimately; it may appear desirable; or; to say the
least; gracious; that I should give in return somewhat more than
I received。 But at present; we are concerned on the law of
justice only; which is that of perfect and accurate exchange;
one circumstance only interfering with the simplicity of this
radical idea of just payment that inasmuch as labour (rightly
directed) is fruitful just as seed is; the fruit (or 〃interest;〃
as it is called) of the labour first given; or 〃advanced;〃 ought
to be taken into account; and balanced by an additional quantity
of labour in the subsequent repayment。 Supposing the repayment to
take place at the end of a year; or of any other given time; this
calculation could be approximately made; but as money (that is to
say; cash) payment involves no reference to time (it being
optional with the person paid to spend what he receives at once
or after any number of years); we can only assume; generally;
that some slight advantage must in equity be allowed to the
person who advances the labour; so that the typical form of
bargain will be: If you give me an hour to…day; I will give you
an hour and five minutes on demand。 If you give me a pound of
bread to day; I will give you seventeen ounces on demand; and so
on。 All that it is necessary for the reader to note is; that the
amount returned is at least in equity not to be less than the
amount given。
The abstract idea; then; of just or due wages; as respects
the labourer; is that they will consist in a sum of money which
will at any time procure for him at least as much labour as he
has given; rather more than less。 And this equity or justice of
payment is; observe; wholly independent of any reference to the
number of men who are willing to do the work。 I want a horseshoe
for my horse。 Twenty smiths; or twenty thousand smiths; may b