Virginia　furnished　more　business　for　a　judge　than　the　whole　State
  of　Illinois？
  NATIONAL　BANK
  JULY；　1848；
  ＇FRAGMENT＇
  The　question　of　a　national　bank　is　at　rest。　　Were　I　President；　I
  should　not　urge　its　reagitation　upon　Congress；　but　should
  Congress　see　fit　to　pass　an　act　to　establish　such　an　institution；
  I　should　not　arrest　it　by　the　veto；　unless　I　should　consider　it
  subject　to　some　constitutional　objection　from　which　I　believe　the
  two　former　banks　to　have　been　free。
  YOUNG　v。s。　OLDPOLITICAL　JEALOUSY
  TO　W。　　H。　　HERNDON。
  WASHINGTON；　July　10；　1848。
  DEAR　WILLIAM：
  Your　letter　covering　the　newspaper　slips　was　received　last　night。
  The　subject　of　that　letter　is　exceedingly　painful　to　me；　and　I
  cannot　but　think　there　is　some　mistake　in　your　impression　of　the
  motives　of　the　old　men。　　I　suppose　I　am　now　one　of　the　old　men；
  and　I　declare　on　my　veracity；　which　I　think　is　good　with　you；
  that　nothing　could　afford　me　more　satisfaction　than　to　learn　that
  you　and　others　of　my　young　friends　at　home　were　doing　battle　in
  the　contest　and　endearing　themselves　to　the　people　and　taking　a
  stand　far　above　any　I　have　ever　been　able　to　reach　in　their
  admiration。　　I　cannot　conceive　that　other　men　feel　differently。
  Of　course　I　cannot　demonstrate　what　I　say；　but　I　was　young　once；
  and　I　am　sure　I　was　never　ungenerously　thrust　back。　　I　hardly
  know　what　to　say。　　The　way　for　a　young　man　to　rise　is　to　improve
  himself　every　way　he　can；　never　suspecting　that　anybody　wishes　to
  hinder　him。　　Allow　me　to　assure　you　that　suspicion　and　jealousy
  never　did　help　any　man　in　any　situation。　　There　may　sometimes　be
  ungenerous　attempts　to　keep　a　young　man　down；　and　they　will
  succeed；　too；　if　he　allows　his　mind　to　be　diverted　from　its　true
  channel　to　brood　over　the　attempted　injury。　　Cast　about　and　see
  if　this　feeling　has　not　injured　every　person　you　have　ever　known
  to　fall　into　it。
  Now；　in　what　I　have　said　I　am　sure　you　will　suspect　nothing　but
  sincere　friendship。　　I　would　save　you　from　a　fatal　error。　　You
  have　been　a　studious　young　man。　　You　are　far　better　informed　on
  almost　all　subjects　than　I　ever　have　been。　　You　cannot　fail　in
  any　laudable　object　unless　you　allow　your　mind　to　be　improperly
  directed。　　I　have　some　the　advantage　of　you　in　the　world's
  experience；　merely　by　being　older；　and　it　is　this　that　induces　me
  to　advise。　　You　still　seem　to　be　a　little　mistaken　about　the
  Congressional　Globe　and　Appendix。　　They　contain　all　of　the
  speeches　that　are　published　in　any　way。　　My　speech　and　Dayton's
  speech　which　you　say　you　got　in　pamphlet　form　are　both　word　for
  word　in　the　Appendix。　　I　repeat　again；　all　are　there。
  Your　friend；　as　ever；
  A。　LINCOLN。
  GENERAL　TAYLOR　AND　THE　VETO
  SPEECH　IN　THE　HOUSE　OF　REPRESENTATIVES；
  JULY　27；　1848。
  Mr。　SPEAKER；　our　Democratic　friends　seem　to　be　in　a　great
  distress　because　they　think　our　candidate　for　the　Presidency
  don't　suit　us。　　Most　of　them　cannot　find　out　that　General　Taylor
  has　any　principles　at　all；　some；　however；　have　discovered　that　he
  has　one；　but　that　one　is　entirely　wrong。　　This　one　principle　is
  his　position　on　the　veto　power。　　The　gentleman　from　Tennessee
  ＇Mr。　Stanton＇　who　has　just　taken　his　seat；　indeed；　has　said　there
  is　very　little；　if　any；　difference　on　this　question　between
  General　Taylor　and　all　the　Presidents；　and　he　seems　to　think　it
  sufficient　detraction　from　General　Taylor's　position　on　it　that
  it　has　nothing　new　in　it。　　But　all　others　whom　I　have　heard　speak
  assail　it　furiously。　　A　new　member　from　Kentucky　＇Mr。　Clark＇；　of
  very　considerable　ability；　was　in　particular　concerned　about　it。
  He　thought　it　altogether　novel　and　unprecedented　for　a　President
  or　a　Presidential　candidate　to　think　of　approving　bills　whose
  constitutionality　may　not　be　entirely　clear　to　his　own　mind。　　He
  thinks　the　ark　of　our　safety　is　gone　unless　Presidents　shall
  always　veto　such　bills　as　in　their　judgment　may　be　of　doubtful
  constitutionality。　　However　clear　Congress　may　be　on　their
  authority　to　pass　any　particular　act；　the　gentleman　from　Kentucky
  thinks　the　President　must　veto　it　if　he　has　doubts　about　it。　　Now
  I　have　neither　time　nor　inclination　to　argue　with　the　gentleman
  on　the　veto　power　as　an　original　question；　but　I　wish　to　show
  that　General　Taylor；　and　not　he；　agrees　with　the　earlier
  statesmen　on　this　question。　　When　the　bill　chartering　the　first
  Bank　of　the　United　States　passed　Congress；　its　constitutionality
  was　questioned。　　Mr。　Madison；　then　in　the　House　of
  Representatives；　as　well　as　others；　had　opposed　it　on　that
  ground。　　General　Washington；　as　President；　was　called　on　to
  approve　or　reject　it。　　He　sought　and　obtained　on　the
  constitutionality　question　the　separate　written　opinions　of
  Jefferson；　Hamilton；　and　Edmund　Randolph；they　then　being
  respectively　Secretary　of　State；　Secretary　of　the　Treasury；　and
  Attorney　general。　　Hamilton's　opinion　was　for　the　power；　while
  Randolph's　and　Jefferson's　were　both　against　it。　　Mr。　Jefferson；
  after　giving　his　opinion　deciding　only　against　the
  constitutionality　of　the　bill；　closes　his　letter　with　the
  paragraph　which　I　now　read：
  〃It　must　be　admitted；　however；　that　unless　the　President's　mind；
  on　a　view　of　everything　which　is　urged　for　and　against　this　bill；
  is　tolerably　clear　that　it　is　unauthorized　by　the　Constitution；
  if　the　pro　and　con　hang　so　even　as　to　balance　his　judgment；　a
  just　respect　for　the　wisdom　of　the　legislature　would　naturally
  decide　the　balance　in　favor　of　their　opinion。　　It　is　chiefly　for
  cases　where　they　are　clearly　misled　by　error；　ambition；　or
  interest；　that　the　Constitution　has　placed　a　check　in　the
  negative　of　the　President。
  〃THOMAS　JEFFERSON。
  〃February　15；　1791。〃
  General　Taylor's　opinion；　as　expressed　in　his　Allison　letter；　is
  as　I　now　read：
  〃The　power　given　by　the　veto　is　a　high　conservative　power；　but；
  in　my　opinion；　should　never　be　exercised　except　in　cases　of　clear
  violation　of　the　Constitution；　or　manifest　haste　and　want　of
  consideration　by　Congress。〃
  It　is　here　seen　that；　in　Mr。　Jefferson's　opinion；　if　on　the
  constitutionality　of　any　given　bill　the　President　doubts；　he　is
  not　to　veto　it；　as　the　gentleman　from　Kentucky　would　have　him　do；
  but　is　to　defer　to　Congress　and　approve　it。　　And　if　we　compare
  the　opinion　of　Jefferson　and　Taylor；　as　expressed　in　these
  paragraphs；　we　shall　find　them　more　exactly　alike　than　we　can
  often　find　any　two　expressions　having　any　literal　difference。
  None　but　interested　faultfinders；　I　think；　can　discover　any
  substantial　variation。
  But　gentlemen　on　the　other　side　are　unanimously　agreed　that
  General　Taylor　has　no　other　principles。　　They　are　in　utter
  darkness　as　to　his　opinions　on　any　of　the　questions　of　policy
  which　occupy　the　public　attention。　　But　is　there　any　doubt　as　to
  what　he　will　do　on　the　prominent　questions　if　elected？　　　Not　the
  least。　　It　is　not　possible　to　know　what　he　will　or　would　do　in
  every　imaginable　case；　because　many　questions　have　passed　away；
  and　others　doubtless　will　arise　which　none　of　us　have　yet　thought
  of；　but　on　the　prominent　questions　of　currency；　tariff；　internal
  improvements；　and　Wilmot　Proviso；　General　Taylor's　course　is　at
  least　as　well　defined　as　is　General　Cass's。　　Why；　in　their
  eagerness　to　get　at　General　Taylor；　several　Democratic　members
  here　have　desired　to　know　whether；　in　case　of　his　election；　a
  bankrupt　law　is　to　be　established。　　Can　they　tell　us　General
  Cass's　opinion　on　this　question？
  ＇Some　member　answered；　〃He　is　against　it。〃＇
  Aye；　how　do　you　know　he　is？　　There　is　nothing　about　it　in　the
  platform；　nor　elsewhere；　that　I　have　seen。　　If　the　gentleman
  knows　of　anything　which　I　do　not　know　he　can　show　it。　　But　to
  return。　　General　Taylor；　in　his　Allison　letter；　says：
  〃Upon　the　subject　of　the　tariff；　the　currency；　the　improvement　of
  our　great　highways；　rivers；　lakes；　and　harbors；　the　will　of　the
  people；　as　expressed　through　their　representatives　in　Congress；
  ought　to　be　respected　and　carried　out　by　the　executive。〃
  Now　this　is　the　whole　matter。　　In　substance；　it　is　this：　The
  people　say　to　General　Taylor；　〃If　you　are　elected；　shall　we　have
  a　national　bank？〃　　He　answers；　''　Your　will；　gentlemen；　not　mine。
  ''　　What　about　the　tariff？〃　〃Say　yourselves。〃　〃Shall　our　rivers
  and　harbors　be　improved？〃　〃Just　as　you　please。　　If　you　desire　a
  bank；　an　alteration　of　the　tariff；　internal　improvements；　any　or
  all；　I　will　not　hinder　you。　　If　you　do　not　desire　them；　I　will
  not　attempt　to　force　them　on　you。　　Send　up　your　members　of
  Congress　from　the　various　districts；　with　opinions　according　to
  your　own；　and　if　they　are　for　these　measures；　or　any　of　them；　I
  shall　have　nothing　to　oppose；　if　they　are　not　for　them；　I　shall
  not；　by　any　appliances　whatever；　attempt　to　dragoon　them　into
  their　adoption。〃
  Now　can　there　be　any　difficulty　in　understanding　this？　　To　you