第 2 节
作者:
翱翔1981 更新:2021-02-19 00:44 字数:9322
difference between them。 If the Whig abolitionists of New York
had voted with us last fall; Mr。 Clay would now be President;
Whig principles in the ascendant; and Texas not annexed; whereas;
by the division; all that either had at stake in the contest was
lost。 And; indeed; it was extremely probable; beforehand; that
such would be the result。 As I always understood; the Liberty
men deprecated the annexation of Texas extremely; and this being
so; why they should refuse to cast their votes 'so' as to prevent
it; even to me seemed wonderful。 What was their process of
reasoning; I can only judge from what a single one of them told
me。 It was this: 〃We are not to do evil that good may come。〃
This general proposition is doubtless correct; but did it apply?
If by your votes you could have prevented the extension; etc。; of
slavery would it not have been good; and not evil; so to have
used your votes; even though it involved the casting of them for
a slaveholder? By the fruit the tree is to be known。 An evil
tree cannot bring forth good fruit。 If the fruit of electing Mr。
Clay would have been to prevent the extension of slavery; could
the act of electing have been evil?
But I will not argue further。 I perhaps ought to say that
individually I never was much interested in the Texas question。
I never could see much good to come of annexation; inasmuch as
they were already a free republican people on our own model。 On
the other hand; I never could very clearly see how the annexation
would augment the evil of slavery。 It always seemed to me that
slaves would be taken there in about equal numbers; with or
without annexation。 And if more were taken because of
annexation; still there would be just so many the fewer left
where they were taken from。 It is possibly true; to some extent;
that; with annexation; some slaves may be sent to Texas and
continued in slavery that otherwise might have been liberated。
To whatever extent this may be true; I think annexation an evil。
I hold it to be a paramount duty of us in the free States; due to
the Union of the States; and perhaps to liberty itself (paradox
though it may seem); to let the slavery of the other States
alone; while; on the other hand; I hold it to be equally clear
that we should never knowingly lend ourselves; directly or
indirectly; to prevent that slavery from dying a natural death
to find new places for it to live in when it can no longer exist
in the old。 Of course I am not now considering what would be our
duty in cases of insurrection among the slaves。 To recur to the
Texas question; I understand the Liberty men to have viewed
annexation as a much greater evil than ever I did; and I would
like to convince you; if I could; that they could have prevented
it; if they had chosen。 I intend this letter for you and Madison
together; and if you and he or either shall think fit to drop me
a line; I shall be pleased。
Yours with respect;
A。 LINCOLN。
1846
REQUEST FOR POLITICAL SUPPORT
TO Dr。 ROBERT BOAL。
SPRINGFIELD; January 7; 1846。
Dr。 ROBERT BOAL; Lacon; Ill。
DEAR DOCTOR:Since I saw you last fall; I have often thought of
writing to you; as it was then understood I would; but; on
reflection; I have always found that I had nothing new to tell
you。 All has happened as I then told you I expected it would
Baker's declining; Hardin's taking the track; and so on。
If Hardin and I stood precisely equal; if neither of us had been
to Congress; or if we both had; it would only accord with what I
have always done; for the sake of peace; to give way to him; and
I expect I should do it。 That I can voluntarily postpone my
pretensions; when they are no more than equal to those to which
they are postponed; you have yourself seen。 But to yield to
Hardin under present circumstances seems to me as nothing else
than yielding to one who would gladly sacrifice me altogether。
This I would rather not submit to。 That Hardin is talented;
energetic; usually generous and magnanimous; I have before this
affirmed to you and do not deny。 You know that my only argument
is that 〃turn about is fair play。〃 This he; practically at least;
denies。
If it would not be taxing you too much; I wish you would write
me; telling the aspect of things in your country; or rather your
district; and also; send the names of some of your Whig
neighbors; to whom I might; with propriety; write。 Unless I can
get some one to do this; Hardin; with his old franking list; will
have the advantage of me。 My reliance for a fair shake (and I
want nothing more) in your country is chiefly on you; because of
your position and standing; and because I am acquainted with so
few others。 Let me hear from you soon。
Yours truly;
A。 LINCOLN。
TO JOHN BENNETT。
SPRINGFIELD; Jan。 15; 1846。
JOHN BENNETT。
FRIEND JOHN:
Nathan Dresser is here; and speaks as though the contest between
Hardin and me is to be doubtful in Menard County。 I know he is
candid and this alarms me some。 I asked him to tell me the names
of the men that were going strong for Hardin; he said Morris was
about as strong as any…now tell me; is Morris going it openly?
You remember you wrote me that he would be neutral。 Nathan also
said that some man; whom he could not remember; had said lately
that Menard County was going to decide the contest and that made
thL; contest very doubtful。 Do you know who that was? Don't
fail to write me instantly on receiving this; telling me all…
particularly the names of those who are going strong against me。
Yours as ever;
A。 LINCOLN。
TO N。 J。 ROCKWELL。
SPRINGFIELD; January 21; 1846。
DEAR SIR:You perhaps know that General Hardin and I have a
contest for the Whig nomination for Congress for this district。
He has had a turn and my argument is 〃turn about is fair play。〃
I shall be pleased if this strikes you as a sufficient
argument。
Yours truly;
A。 LINCOLN。
TO JAMES BERDAN。
SPRINGFIELD; April 26; 1846。
DEAR SIR:I thank you for the promptness with which you answered
my letter from Bloomington。 I also thank you for the frankness
with which you comment upon a certain part of my letter; because
that comment affords me an opportunity of trying to express
myself better than I did before; seeing; as I do; that in that
part of my letter; you have not understood me as I intended to be
understood。
In speaking of the 〃dissatisfaction〃 of men who yet mean to do no
wrong; etc。; I mean no special application of what I said to the
Whigs of Morgan; or of Morgan & Scott。 I only had in my mind the
fact that previous to General Hardin's withdrawal some of his
friends and some of mine had become a little warm; and I felt;
and meant to say; that for them now to meet face to face and
converse together was the best way to efface any remnant of
unpleasant feeling; if any such existed。
I did not suppose that General Hardin's friends were in any
greater need of having their feelings corrected than mine were。
Since I saw you at Jacksonville; I have had no more suspicion of
the Whigs of Morgan than of those of any other part of the
district。 I write this only to try to remove any impression that
I distrust you and the other Whigs of your country。
Yours truly;
A。 LINCOLN。
TO JAMES BERDAN。
SPRINGFIELD; May 7; 1866。
DEAR SIR:It is a matter of high moral obligation; if not of
necessity; for me to attend the Coles and Edwards courts。 I have
some cases in both of them; in which the parties have my promise;
and are depending upon me。 The court commences in Coles on the
second Monday; and in Edgar on the third。 Your court in Morgan
commences on the fourth Monday; and it is my purpose to be with
you then; and make a speech。 I mention the Coles and Edgar
courts in order that if I should not reach Jacksonville at the
time named you may understand the reason why。 I do not; however;
think there is much danger of my being detained; as I shall go
with a purpose not to be; and consequently shall engage in no new
cases that might delay me。
Yours truly;
A。 LINCOLN。
VERSES WRITTEN BY LINCOLN AFTER A VISIT TO HIS OLD HOME IN
INDIANA…(A FRAGMENT)。
'In December; 1847; when Lincoln was stumping for Clay; he
crossed into Indiana and revisited his old home。 He writes:
〃That part of the country is within itself as unpoetical as any
spot on earth; but still seeing it and its objects and
inhabitants aroused feelings in me which were certainly poetry;
though whether my expression of these feelings is poetry; is
quite another question。〃'
Near twenty years have passed away
Since here I bid farewell
To woods and fields; and scenes of play;
And playmates loved so well。
Where many were; but