triumphantly　and　confidently；　〃We　investigate　only　facts；〃　imagining
  that　these　words　contain　some　meaning。　　It　is　impossible　to
  investigate　facts　alone；　because　the　facts　which　are　subject　to　our
  investigation　are　INNUMERABLE　（in　the　definite　sense　of　that　word）；…
  …innumerable。　　Before　we　proceed　to　investigate　facts；　we　must　have
  a　theory　on　the　foundation　of　which　these　or　those　facts　can　be
  inquired　into；　i。e。；　selected　from　the　incalculable　quantity。
  And　this　theory　exists；　and　is　even　very　definitely　expressed；
  although　many　of　the　workers　in　contemporary　science　do　not　know　it；
  or　often　pretend　that　they　do　not　know　it。　　Exactly　thus　has　it
  always　been　with　all　prevailing　and　guiding　doctrines。　　The
  foundations　of　every　doctrine　are　always　stated　in　a　theory；　and　the
  so…called　learned　men　merely　invent　further　deductions　from　the
  foundations　once　stated。　　Thus　contemporary　science　is　selecting　its
  facts　on　the　foundation　of　a　very　definite　theory；　which　it
  sometimes　knows；　sometimes　refuses　to　know；　and　sometimes　really
  does　not　know；　but　the　theory　exists。
  The　theory　is　as　follows：　　All　mankind　is　an　undying　organism；　men
  are　the　particles　of　that　organism；　and　each　one　of　them　has　his　own
  special　task　for　the　service　of　others。　　In　the　same　manner；　the
  cells　united　in　an　organism　share　among　them　the　labor　of　fight　for
  existence　of　the　whole　organism；　they　magnify　the　power　of　one
  capacity；　and　weaken　another；　and　unite　in　one　organ；　in　order　the
  better　to　supply　the　requirements　of　the　whole　organism。　　And
  exactly　in　the　same　manner　as　with　gregarious　animals；ants　or
  bees；the　separate　individuals　divide　the　labor　among　them。　　The
  queen　lays　the　egg；　the　drone　fructifies　it；　the　bee　works　his　whole
  life　long。　　And　precisely　this　thing　takes　place　in　mankind　and　in
  human　societies。　　And　therefore；　in　order　to　find　the　law　of　life
  for　man；　it　is　necessary　to　study　the　laws　of　the　life　and　the
  development　of　organisms。
  In　the　life　and　development　of　organisms；　we　find　the　following
  laws：　　the　law　of　differentiation　and　integration；　the　law　that
  every　phenomenon　is　accompanied　not　by　direct　consequences　alone；
  another　law　regarding　the　instability　of　type；　and　so　on。　　All　this
  seems　very　innocent；　but　it　is　only　necessary　to　draw　the　deductions
  from　all　these　laws；　in　order　to　immediately　perceive　that　these
  laws　incline　in　the　same　direction　as　the　law　of　Malthus。　　These
  laws　all　point　to　one　thing；　namely；　to　the　recognition　of　that
  division　of　labor　which　exists　in　human　communities；　as　organic；
  that　is　to　say；　as　indispensable。　　And　therefore；　the　unjust
  position　in　which　we；　the　people　who　have　freed　ourselves　from
  labor；　find　ourselves；　must　be　regarded　not　from　the　point　of　view
  of　common…sense　and　justice；　but　merely　as　an　undoubted　fact；
  confirming　the　universal　law。
  Moral　philosophy　also　justified　every　sort　of　cruelty　and　harshness；
  but　this　resulted　in　a　philosophical　manner；　and　therefore　wrongly。
  But　with　science；　all　this　results　scientifically；　and　therefore　in
  a　manner　not　to　be　doubted。
  How　can　we　fail　to　accept　so　very　beautiful　a　theory？　　It　is　merely
  necessary　to　look　upon　human　society　as　an　object　of　contemplation；
  and　I　can　console　myself　with　the　thought　that　my　activity；　whatever
  may　be　its　nature；　is　a　functional　activity　of　the　organism　of
  humanity；　and　that　therefore　there　cannot　arise　any　question　as　to
  whether　it　is　just　that　I；　in　employing　the　labor　of　others；　am
  doing　only　that　which　is　agreeable　to　me；　as　there　can　arise　no
  question　as　to　the　division　of　labor　between　the　brain　cells　and　the
  muscular　cells。　　How　is　it　possible　not　to　admit　so　very　beautiful　a
  theory；　in　order　that　one　may　be　able；　ever　after；　to　pocket　one's
  conscience；　and　have　a　perfectly　unbridled　animal　existence；　feeling
  beneath　one's　self　that　support　of　science　which　is　not　to　be　shaken
  nowadays！
  And　it　is　on　this　new　doctrine　that　the　justification　for　men's
  idleness　and　cruelty　is　now　founded。
  CHAPTER　II。
  This　doctrine　had　its　rise　not　so　very　longfifty　yearsago。　　Its
  principal　founder　was　the　French　savant　Comte。　　There　occurred　to
  Comte；a　systematist；　and　a　religious　man　to　boot；under　the
  influence　of　the　then　novel　physiological　investigations　of　Biche；
  the　old　idea　already　set　forth　by　Menenius　Agrippa；the　idea　that
  human　society；　all　humanity　even；　might　be　regarded　as　one　whole；　as
  an　organism；　and　men　as　living　parts　of　the　separate　organs；　having
  each　his　own　definite　appointment　to　serve　the　entire　organism。
  This　idea　so　pleased　Comte；　that　upon　it　he　began　to　erect　a
  philosophical　theory；　and　this　theory　so　carried　him　away；　that　he
  utterly　forgot　that　the　point　of　departure　for　his　theory　was
  nothing　more　than　a　very　pretty　comparison；　which　was　suitable　for　a
  fable；　but　which　could　by　no　means　serve　as　the　foundation　for
  science。　　He；　as　frequently　happens；　mistook　his　pet　hypothesis　for
  an　axiom；　and　imagined　that　his　whole　theory　was　erected　on　the　very
  firmest　of　foundations。　　According　to　his　theory；　it　seemed　that
  since　humanity　is　an　organism；　the　knowledge　of　what　man　is；　and　of
  what　should　be　his　relations　to　the　world；　was　possible　only　through
  a　knowledge　of　the　features　of　this　organism。　　For　the　knowledge　of
  these　qualities；　man　is　enabled　to　take　observations　on　other　and
  lower　organisms；　and　to　draw　conclusions　from　their　life。
  Therefore；　in　the　fist　place；　the　true　and　only　method；　according　to
  Comte；　is　the　inductive；　and　all　science　is　only　such　when　it　has
  experiment　as　its　basis；　in　the　second　place；　the　goal　and　crown　of
  sciences　is　formed　by　that　new　science　dealing　with　the　imaginary
  organism　of　humanity；　or　the　super…organic　being；humanity；and
  this　newly　devised　science　is　sociology。
  And　from　this　view　of　science　it　appears；　that　all　previous
  knowledge　was　deceitful；　and　that　the　whole　story　of　humanity；　in
  the　sense　of　self…knowledge；　has　been　divided　into　three；　actually
  into　two；　periods：　　the　theological　and　metaphysical　period；
  extending　from　the　beginning　of　the　world　to　Comte；　and　the　present
  period；that　of　the　only　true　science；　positive　science；beginning
  with　Comte。
  All　this　was　very　well。　　There　was　but　one　error；　and　that　was
  this；that　the　whole　edifice　was　erected　on　the　sand；　on　the
  arbitrary　and　false　assertion　that　humanity　is　an　organism。　　This
  assertion　was　arbitrary；　because　we　have　just　as　much　right　to　admit
  the　existence　of　a　human　organism；　not　subject　to　observation；　as　we
  have　to　admit　the　existence　of　any　other　invisible；　fantastic　being。
  This　assertion　was　erroneous；　because　for　the　understanding　of
  humanity；　i。e。；　of　men；　the　definition　of　an　organism　was
  incorrectly　constructed；　while　in　humanity　itself　all　actual　signs
  of　organism；the　centre　of　feeling　or　consciousness；　are　lacking。
  ｛2｝
  But；　in　spite　of　the　arbitrariness　and　incorrectness　of　the
  fundamental　assumption　of　positive　philosophy；　it　was　accepted　by
  the　so…called　cultivated　world　with　the　greatest　sympathy。　　In　this
  connection；　one　thing　is　worthy　of　note：　　that　out　of　the　works　of
  Comte；　consisting　of　two　parts；　of　positive　philosophy　and　of
  positive　politics；　only　the　first　was　adopted　by　the　learned　world；…
  …that　part　which　justifieth；　on　new　promises；　the　existent　evil　of
  human　societies；　but　the　second　part；　treating　of　the　moral
  obligations　of　altruism；　arising　from　the　recognition　of　mankind　as
  an　organism；　was　regarded　as　not　only　of　no　importance；　but　as
  trivial　and　unscientific。　　It　was　a　repetition　of　the　same　thing
  that　had　happened　in　the　case　of　Kant's　works。　　The　〃Critique　of
  Pure　Reason〃　was　adopted　by　the　scientific　crowd；　but　the　〃Critique
  of　Applied　Reason；〃　that　part　which　contains　the　gist　of　moral
  doctrine；　was　repudiated。　　In　Kant's　doctrine；　that　was　accepted　as
  scientific　which　subserved　the　existent　evil。　　But　the　positive
  philosophy；　which　was　accepted　by　the　crowd；　was　founded　on　an
  arbitrary　and　erroneous　basis；　was　in　itself　too　unfounded；　and
  therefore　unsteady；　and　could　not　support　itself　alone。　　And　so；
  amid　all　the　multitude　of　the　idle　plays　of　thought　of　the　men
  professing　the　so…called　science；　there　presents　itself　an　assertion
  equally　devoid　of　novelty；　and　equally　arbitrary　and　erroneous；　to
  the　effect　that　living　beings；　i。e。；　organisms；　have　had　their　rise
  in　each　other；not　only　one　organism　from　another；　but　one　from
  many；　i。e。；　that　in　a　very　long　interval　of　time　（in　a　million　of
  years；　for　instance）；　not　only　could　a　duck　and　a　fish　proceed　from
  one　ancestor；　but　that　one　animal　might　result　from　a　whole　hive　of
  bees。　　And　this　arbitrary　and　erroneous　assumption　was　accepted　by
  the　learned　world　with　still　greater　and　more　universal　sympathy。
  This　assumption　was　arbitrary；　because　no　one　has　ever　seen　how　one
  organism　is　made　from　another；　and　therefore　the　hypothesis　as　to
  the　origin　of　species　will　always　remain　an　hypothesis；　and　not　an
  experimental　fact。　　　And　this　hypothesis　was　also　erroneous；　because
  the　decision　of　the　question　as　to　the　origin　of　speciesthat　they
  have　originated；　in　consequence　of　the　law　of　heredity　and　fitness；
  in　the　course　of　an　interminably　long　time