第 19 节
作者:
雨霖铃 更新:2024-07-12 09:34 字数:9322
a particular purpose; would be imperative on the Commissioners; unless they preferred to resign their office。 Once framed; however; Parliament should have no power to alter the measure; but solely to pass or reject it; or; if partially disapproved of; remit it to the Commission for reconsideration。 The Commissioners should be appointed by the Crown; but should hold their offices for a time certain; say five years; unless removed on an address from the two Houses of Parliament; grounded either on personal misconduct (as in the case of judges); or on refusal to draw up a Bill in obedience to the demands of Parliament。 At the expiration of the five years a member should cease to hold office unless reappointed; in order to provide a convenient mode of getting rid of those who had not been found equal to their duties; and of infusing new and younger blood into the body。 The necessity of some provision corresponding to this was felt even in the Athenian Democracy; where; in the time of its most complete ascendancy; the popular Ecclesia could pass Psephisms (mostly decrees on single matters of policy); but laws; so called; could only be made or altered by a different and less numerous body; renewed annually; called the Nomothetae; whose duty it also was to revise the whole of the laws; and keep them consistent with one another。 In the English Constitution there is great difficulty in introducing any arrangement which is new both in form and in substance; but comparatively little repugnance is felt to the attainment of new purposes by an adaptation of existing forms and traditions。 It appears to me that the means might be devised of enriching the Constitution with this great improvement through the machinery of the House of Lords。 A Commission for preparing Bills would in itself be no more an innovation on the Constitution than the Board for the administration of the Poor Laws; or the Inclosure Commission。 If; in consideration of the great importance and dignity of the trust; it were made a rule that every person appointed a member of the Legislative Commission; unless removed from office on an address from Parliament; should be a Peer for life; it is probable that the same good sense and taste which leave the judicial functions of the Peerage practically to the exclusive care of the law lords; would leave the business of legislation; except on questions involving political principles and interests; to the professional legislators; that Bills originating in the Upper House would always be drawn up by them; that the Government would devolve on them the framing of all its Bills; and that private members of the House of Commons would gradually find it convenient; and likely to facilitate the passing of their measures through the two Houses; if instead of bringing in a Bill and submitting it directly to the House; they obtained leave to introduce it and have it referred to the Legislative Commission。 For it would; of course; be open to the House to refer for the consideration of that body not a subject merely; but any specific proposal; or a Draft of a Bill in extenso; when any member thought himself capable of preparing one such as ought to pass; and the House would doubtless refer every such draft to the Commission; if only as materials; and for the benefit of the suggestions it might contain: as they would; in like manner; refer every amendment or objection which might be proposed in writing by any member of the House after a measure had left the Commissioners' hands。 The alteration of Bills by a Committee of the whole House would cease; not by formal abolition; but by desuetude; the right not being abandoned; but laid up in the same armoury with the royal veto; the right of withholding the supplies; and other ancient instruments of political warfare; which no one desires to see used; but no one likes to part with; lest they should any time be found to be still needed in an extraordinary emergency。 By such arrangements as these; legislation would assume its proper place as a work of skilled labour and special study and experience; while the most important liberty of the nation; that of being governed only by laws assented to by its elected representatives; would be fully preserved; and made more valuable by being detached from the serious; but by no means unavoidable; drawbacks which now accompany it in the form of ignorant and ill…considered legislation。 Instead of the function of governing; for which it is radically unfit; the proper office of a representative assembly is to watch and control the government: to throw the light of publicity on its acts: to compel a full exposition and justification of all of them which any one considers questionable; to censure them if found condemnable; and; if the men who compose the government abuse their trust; or fulfil it in a manner which conflicts with the deliberate sense of the nation; to expel them from office; and either expressly or virtually appoint their successors。 This is surely ample power; and security enough for the liberty of the nation。 In addition to this; the Parliament has an office; not inferior even to this in importance; to be at once the nation's Committee of Grievances; and its Congress of Opinions; an arena in which not only the general opinion of the nation; but that of every section of it; and as far as possible of every eminent individual whom it contains; can produce itself in full light and challenge discussion; where every person in the country may count upon finding somebody who speaks his mind; as well or better than he could speak it himself… not to friends and partisans exclusively; but in the face of opponents; to be tested by adverse controversy; where those whose opinion is overruled; feel satisfied that it is heard; and set aside not by a mere act of will; but for what are thought superior reasons; and commend themselves as such to the representatives of the majority of the nation; where every party or opinion in the country can muster its strength; and be cured of any illusion concerning the number or power of its adherents; where the opinion which prevails in the nation makes itself manifest as prevailing; and marshals its hosts in the presence of the government; which is thus enabled and compelled to give way to it on the mere manifestation; without the actual employment; of its strength; where statesmen can assure themselves; far more certainly than by any other signs; what elements of opinion and power are growing; and what declining; and are enabled to shape their measures with some regard not solely to present exigencies; but to tendencies in progress。 Representative assemblies are often taunted by their enemies with being places of mere talk and bavardage。 There has seldom been more misplaced derision。 I know not how a representative assembly can more usefully employ itself than in talk; when the subject of talk is the great public interests of the country; and every sentence of it represents the opinion either of some important body of persons in the nation; or of an individual in whom some such body have reposed their confidence。 A place where every interest and shade of opinion in the country can have its cause even passionately pleaded; in the face of the government and of all other interests and opinions; can compel them to listen; and either comply; or state clearly why they do not; is in itself; if it answered no other purpose; one of the most important political institutions that can exist anywhere; and one of the foremost benefits of free government。 Such 〃talking〃 would never be looked upon with disparagement if it were not allowed to stop 〃doing〃; which it never would; if assemblies knew and acknowledged that talking and discussion are their proper business; while doing; as the result of discussion; is the task not of a miscellaneous body; but of individuals specially trained to it; that the fit office of an assembly is to see that those individuals are honestly and intelligently chosen; and to interfere no further with them; except by unlimited latitude of suggestion and criticism; and by applying or withholding the final seal of national assent。 It is for want of this judicious reserve that popular assemblies attempt to do what they cannot do well… to govern and legislate… and provide no machinery but their own for much of it; when of course every hour spent in talk is an hour withdrawn from actual business。 But the very fact which most unfits such bodies for a Council of Legislation qualifies them the more for their other office… namely; that they are not a selection of the greatest political minds in the country; from whose opinions little could with certainty be inferred concerning those of the nation; but are; when properly constituted; a fair sample of every grade of intellect among the people which is at all entitled to a voice in public affairs。 Their part is to indicate wants; to be an organ for popular demands; and a place of adverse discussion for all opinions relating to public matters; both great and small; and; along with this; to check by criticism; and eventually by withdrawing their support; those high public officers who really conduct the public business; or who appoint those by whom it is conducted。 Nothing but the res