Yrujo　with　Burr　and　his　principal　accomplices；　should　come　fully　out；
  and　judicially；　as　they　will　establish　the　just　complaints　we　have
  against　his　nation。
  I　did　not　see　till　last　night　the　opinion　of　the　Judge　on　the
  _subpoena　duces　tecum_　against　the　President。　　Considering　the
  question　there　as　_coram　non　judice_；　I　did　not　read　his　argument
  with　much　attention。　　Yet　I　saw　readily　enough；　that；　as　is　usual
  where　an　opinion　is　to　be　supported；　right　or　wrong；　he　dwells　much
  on　smaller　objections；　and　passes　over　those　which　are　solid。　　Laying
  down　the　position　generally；　that　all　persons　owe　obedience　to
  subpoenas；　he　admits　no　exception　unless　it　can　be　produced　in　his
  law　books。　　But　if　the　Constitution　enjoins　on　a　particular　officer
  to　be　always　engaged　in　a　particular　set　of　duties　imposed　on　him；
  does　not　this　supersede　the　general　law；　subjecting　him　to　minor
  duties　inconsistent　with　these？　　The　Constitution　enjoins　his
  constant　agency　in　the　concerns　of　6。　millions　of　people。　　Is　the　law
  paramount　to　this；　which　calls　on　him　on　behalf　of　a　single　one？　　Let
  us　apply　the　Judge's　own　doctrine　to　the　case　of　himself　&　his
  brethren。　　The　sheriff　of　Henrico　summons　him　from　the　bench；　to
  quell　a　riot　somewhere　in　his　county。　　The　federal　judge　is；　by　the
  general　law；　a　part　of　the　_posse_　of　the　State　sheriff。　　Would　the
  Judge　abandon　major　duties　to　perform　lesser　ones？　　Again；　the　court
  of　Orleans　or　Maine　commands；　by　subpoenas；　the　attendance　of　all　the
  judges　of　the　Supreme　Court。　　Would　they　abandon　their　posts　as
  judges；　and　the　interests　of　millions　committed　to　them；　to　serve　the
  purposes　of　a　single　individual？　　The　leading　principle　of　our
  Constitution　is　the　independence　of　the　Legislature；　executive　and
  judiciary　of　each　other；　and　none　are　more　jealous　of　this　than　the
  judiciary。　　But　would　the　executive　be　independent　of　the　judiciary；
  if　he　were　subject　to　the　_commands_　of　the　latter；　&　to　imprisonment
  for　disobedience；　if　the　several　courts　could　bandy　him　from　pillar
  to　post；　keep　him　constantly　trudging　from　north　to　south　&　east　to
  west；　and　withdraw　him　entirely　from　his　constitutional　duties？　　The
  intention　of　the　Constitution；　that　each　branch　should　be　independent
  of　the　others；　is　further　manifested　by　the　means　it　has　furnished　to
  each；　to　protect　itself　from　enterprises　of　force　attempted　on　them
  by　the　others；　and　to　none　has　it　given　more　effectual　or　diversified
  means　than　to　the　executive。　　Again；　because　ministers　can　go　into　a
  court　in　London　as　witnesses；　without　interruption　to　their　executive
  duties；　it　is　inferred　that　they　would　go　to　a　court　1000。　or　1500。
  miles　off；　and　that　ours　are　to　be　dragged　from　Maine　to　Orleans　by
  every　criminal　who　will　swear　that　their　testimony　‘may　be　of　use　to
  him。'　The　Judge　says；　‘_it　is　apparent_　that　the　President's　duties
  as　chief　magistrate　do　not　demand　his　whole　time；　&　are　not
  unremitting。'　If　he　alludes　to　our　annual　retirement　from　the　seat　of
  government；　during　the　sickly　season；　he　should　be　told　that　such
  arrangements　are　made　for　carrying　on　the　public　business；　at　and
  between　the　several　stations　we　take；　that　it　goes　on　as
  unremittingly　there；　as　if　we　were　at　the　seat　of　government。　　I　pass
  more　hours　in　public　business　at　Monticello　than　I　do　here；　every
  day；　and　it　is　much　more　laborious；　because　all　must　be　done　in
  writing。　　Our　stations　being　known；　all　communications　come　to　them
  regularly；　as　to　fixed　points。　　It　would　be　very　different　were　we
  always　on　the　road；　or　placed　in　the　noisy　&　crowdedtaverns　where
  courts　are　held。　　Mr。　Rodney　is　expected　here　every　hour；　having　been
  kept　away　by　a　sick　child。
  I　salute　you　with　friendship　and　respect。