or　categories　are　also　spoken　of　as　notions：　and　to　get　a　notion　of　an　object
  therefore　can　only　mean；　in　this　language；　to　grasp　it　under　the　form　of　being
  conditioned　and　derivative。　Consequently；　if　the　object　in　question　be　the　True；
  the　Infinite；　the　Unconditioned；　we　change　it　by　our　notions　into　a　finite　and
  conditioned；　whereby；　instead　of　apprehending　the　truth　by　thought；　we　have
  perverted　it　into　untruth。
  Such　is　the　one　simple　line　of　argument　advanced　for　the　thesis　that　the
  knowledge　of　God　and　of　truth　must　be　immediate；　or　intuitive。　At　an　earlier
  period　all　sort　of　anthropomorphic　conceptions；　as　they　are　termed；　were
  banished　from　God；　as　being　finite　and　therefore　unworthy　of　the　infinite；　and　in
  this　way　God　had　been　reduced　to　a　tolerably　blank　being。　But　in　those　days　the
  thought…forms　were　in　general　not　supposed　to　come　under　the　head　of
  anthropomorphism。　Thought　was　believed　rather　to　strip　finitude　from　the
  conceptions　of　the　Absolute…in　agreement　with　the　above…mentioned　conviction　of
  all　ages；　that　reflection　is　the　only　road　to　truth。　But　now；　at　length；　even　the
  thought…forms　are　pronounced　anthropomorphic；　and　thought　itself　is　described　as
  a　mere　faculty　of　Unitisation。
  Jacobi　has　stated　this　charge　most　distinctly　in　the　seventh　supplement　to　his
  Letters　on　Spinoza　…　borrowing　his　line　of　argument　from　the　works　of　Spinoza
  himself；　and　applying　it　as　a　weapon　against　knowledge　in　general。　In　his　attack
  knowledge　is　taken　to　mean　knowledge　of　the　finite　only；　a　process　of　thought
  from　one　condition　in　a　series　to　another；　each　of　which　is　at　once　conditioning
  and　conditioned。　According　to　such　a　view；　to　explain　and　to　get　the　notion　of
  anything；　is　the　same　as　to　show　it　to　be　derived　from　something　else。　Whatever
  such　knowledge　embraces；　consequently；　is　partial；　dependent；　and　finite；　while
  the　infinite　or　true；　i。e。　God；　lies　outside　of　the　mechanical　interconnection　to
  which　knowledge　is　said　to　be　confined。　It　is　important　to　observe　that；　while
  Kant　makes　the　finite　nature　of　the　Categories　consist　mainly　in　the　formal
  circumstance　that　they　are　subjective；　Jacobi　discusses　the　Categories　in　their　own
  proper　character；　and　pronounces　them　to　be　in　their　very　import　finite。　What
  Jacobi　chiefly　had　before　his　eyes；　when　he　thus　described　science；　was　the
  brilliant　successes　of　the　physical　or　'exact'　sciences　in　ascertaining　natural　forces
  and　laws。　It　is　certainly　not　on　the　finite　ground　occupied　by　these　sciences　that
  we　can　expect　to　meet　the　in…dwelling　presence　of　the　infinite。　Lalande　was　right
  when　he　said　he　had　swept　the　whole　heaven　with　his　glass；　and　seen　no　God。
  （See　§　60n。）　In　the　field　of　physical　science；　the　universal；　which　is　the　final
  result　of　analysis；　is　only　the　indeterminate　aggregate…of　the　external　finite…in　one
  word；　Matter：　and　Jacobi　well　perceived　that　there　was　no　other　issue　obtainable
  in　the　way　of　a　mere　advance　from　one　explanatory　clause　or　law　to　another。
  §63
  All　the　while　the　doctrine　that　truth　exists　for　the　mind　was　so　strongly　maintained
  by　Jacobi；　that　Reason　alone　is　declared　to　be　that　by　which　man　lives。　This
  Reason　is　the　knowledge　of　God。　But；　seeing　that　derivative　knowledge　is
  restricted　to　the　compass　of　finite　facts；　Reason　is　knowledge　underivative；　or
  Faith。
  Knowledge；　Faith；　Thought；　Intuition　are　the　categories　that　we　meet　with　on　this
  line　of　reflection。　These　terms；　as　presumably　familiar　to　every　one；　are　only　too
  frequently　subjected　to　an　arbitrary　use；　under　no　better　guidance　than　the
  conceptions　and　distinctions　of　psychology；　without　any　investigation　into　their
  nature　and　notion；　which　is　the　main　question　after　all。　Thus；　we　often　find
  knowledge　contrasted　with　faith；　and　faith　at　the　same　time　explained　to　be　an
  underivative　or　intuitive　knowledge　—　so　that　it　must　be　at　least　some　sort　of
  knowledge。　And；　besides；　it　is　unquestionably　a　fact　of　experience；　firstly；　that
  what　we　believe　is　in　our　consciousness…which　implies　that　we　know　about　it；　and
  secondly；　that　this　belief　is　a　certainty　in　our　consciousness　…　which　implies　that
  we　know　it。　Again；　and　especially；　we　find　thought　opposed　to　immediate
  knowledge　and　faith；　and；　in　particular；　to　intuition。　But　if　this　intuition　be
  qualified　as　intellectual；　we　must　really　mean　intuition　which　thinks；　unless；　in　a
  question　about　the　nature　of　God；　we　are　willing　to　interpret　intellect　to　mean
  images　and　representations　of　imagination。　The　word　faith　or　belief；　in　the　dialect
  of　this　system；　comes　to　be　employed　even　with　reference　to　common　objects
  that　are　present　to　the　senses。　We　believe；　says　Jacobi；　that　we　have　a　body…we
  believe　in　the　existence　of　the　things　of　sense。　But　if　we　are　speaking　of　faith　in
  the　True　and　Eternal；　and　saying　that　God　is　given　and　revealed　to　us　in
  immediate　knowledge　or　intuition；　we　are　concerned　not　with　the　things　of　sense；
  but　with　objects　special　to　our　thinking　mind；　with　truths　of　inherently　universal
  significance。　And　when　the　individuals；　or　in　other　words　personality；　is　under
  discussion…not　the　'I'　of　experience；　or　a　single　private　person　—　above　all；　when
  the　personality　of　God　is　before　us'；　we　are　speaking　of　personality　unalloyed　—
  of　a　personality　in　its　own　nature　universal。　Such　personality　is　a　thought；　and
  falls　within　the　province　of　thought　only。　More　than　this。　Pure　and　simple
  intuition　is　completely　the　same　as　pure　and　simple　thought。　Intuition　and　belief；
  in　the　first　instance；　denote　the　definite　conceptions　we　attach　to　these　words　in
  our　ordinary　employment　of　them：　and　to　this　extent　they　differ　from　thought　in
  certain　points　which　nearly　every　one　can　understand。　But　here　they　are　taken　in
  a　higher　sense；　and　must　be　interpreted　to　mean　a　belief　in　God；　or　an　intellectual
  intuition　of　God；　in　short；　we　must　put　aside　all　that　especially　distinguishes
  thought　on　the　one　side　from　belief　and　intuition　on　the　other。　How　belief　and
  intuition；　when　transferred　to　these　higher　regions；　differ　from　thought；　it　is
  impossible　for　any　one　to　say。　And　yet；　such　are　the　barren　distinctions　of　words；
  with　which　men　fancy　that　they　assert　an　important　truth；　even　while　the
  formulae　they　maintain　are　identical　with　those　which　they　impugn。
  The　term　Faith　brings　with　it　the　special　advantage　of　suggesting　the　faith　of　the
  Christian　religion；　it　seems　to　include　Christian　faith；　or　perhaps　even　to　coincide
  with　it；　and　thus　the　Philosophy　of　Faith　has　a　thoroughly　orthodox　and　Christian
  look；　on　the　strength　of　which　it　takes　the　liberty　of　uttering　its　arbitrary　dicta　with
  greater　pretension　and　authority。　But　we　must　not　let　ourselves　be　deceived　by
  the　semblance　surreptitiously　secured　by　a　merely　verbal　similarity。　The　two
  things　are　radically　distinct。　Firstly；　the　Christian　faith　comprises　in　it　an　authority
  of　the　Church：　but　the　faith　of　Jacobi's　philosophy　has　no　other　authority　than
  that　of　a　personal　revelation。　And；　secondly；　the　Christian　faith　is　a　copious　body
  of　objective　truth；　a　system　of　knowledge　and　doctrine：　while　the　scope　of　the
  philosophic　faith　is　so　utterly　indefinite；　that；　while　it　has　room　for　the　faith　of　the
  Christian；　it　equally　admits　a　belief　in　the　divinity　of　the　Dalai　Lama；　the　ox；　or
  the　monkey…thus；　so　far　as　it　goes；　narrowing　Deity　down　to　its　simplest　terms；　a
  'Supreme　Being'。　Faith　itself；　taken　in　this　professedly　philosophical　sense；　is
  nothing　but　the　sapless　abstract　of　immediate　knowledge　—　a　purely　formal
  category　applicable　to　very　different　facts；　and　it　ought　never　to　be　confused　or
  identified　with　the　spiritual　fullness　of　Christian　faith；　whether　we　look　at　that
  faith　in　the　heart　of　the　believer　and　the　indwelling　of　the　Holy　Spirit；　or　in　the
  system　of　theological　doctrine。
  With　what　is　here　called　faith　or　immediate　knowledge　must　also　be　identified
  inspiration；　the　heart's　revelations；　the　truths　implanted　in　man　by　nature；　and　also
  in　particular；　healthy　reason　or　Common　Sense；　as　it　is　called。　All　these　forms
  agree　in　adopting　as　their　leading　principle　the　immediacy；　or　self…evident　way；　in
  which　a　fact　or　body　of　truths　is　presented　in　consciousness。
  §64
  This　immediate　knowledge；　consists　in　knowing　that　the　Infinite；　the　Eternal；　the
  God　which　is　in　our　Idea；　really　is：　or；　it　asserts　that　in　our　consciousness　there　is
  immediately　and　inseparably　bound　up　with　this　idea　the　certainty　of　its　actual
  being。
  To　seek　to　controvert　these　maxims　of　immediate　knowledge　is　the　last　thing
  philosophers　would　think　of。　They　may　rather　find　occasion　for　self…gratulation
  when　these　ancient　doctrines；　expressing　as　they　do　the　general　tenor　of
  philosophic　teaching；　have；　even　in　this　unphilosophical　fashion；　become　to　some
  extent　universal　convictions　of　the　age。　The　true　marvel　rather　is　that　any　one
  could　suppose　that　these　principles　were　opposed　to　philosophy…the　maxims；　viz。；
  that　whatever　is　held　to　be　true　is　immanent　in　the　mind；　and　that　there　is　truth
  for　the　mind　（§　63）。　From　a　formal　point　of　view；　there　is　a　peculiar　interest　in
  the　maxim　that