habits；　and　characteristicsthat　we　are　enabled　to　see　before　us
  the　men　as　they　really　lived。　　Plutarch's　great　merit　consists　in
  his　attention　to　these　little　things；　without　giving　them　undue
  preponderance；　or　neglecting　those　which　are　of　greater　moment。
  Sometimes　he　hits　off　an　individual　trait　by　an　anecdote；　which
  throws　more　light　upon　the　character　described　than　pages　of
  rhetorical　description　would　do。　　In　some　cases；　he　gives　us
  the　favourite　maxim　of　his　hero；　and　the　maxims　of　men　often
  reveal　their　hearts。
  Then；　as　to　foibles；　the　greatest　of　men　are　not　visually
  symmetrical。　　Each　has　his　defect；　his　twist；　his　craze；　and　it　is
  by　his　faults　that　the　great　man　reveals　his　common　humanity。　　We
  may；　at　a　distance；　admire　him　as　a　demigod；　but　as　we　come　nearer
  to　him；　we　find　that　he　is　but　a　fallible　man；　and　our　brother。　（6）
  Nor　are　the　illustrations　of　the　defects　of　great　men　without
  their　uses；　for；　as　Dr。　Johnson　observed；　〃If　nothing　but　the
  bright　side　of　characters　were　shown；　we　should　sit　down　in
  despondency；　and　think　it　utterly　impossible　to　imitate
  them　in　anything。〃
  Plutarch；　himself　justifies　his　method　of　portraiture　by　averring
  that　his　design　was　not　to　write　histories；　but　lives。　　〃The　most
  glorious　exploits；〃　he　says；　〃do　not　always　furnish　us　with　the
  clearest　discoveries　of　virtue　or　of　vice　in　men。　　Sometimes　a
  matter　of　much　less　moment；　an　expression　or　a　jest；　better
  informs　us　of　their　characters　and　inclinations　than　battles　with
  the　slaughter　of　tens　of　thousands；　and　the　greatest　arrays　of
  armies　or　sieges　of　cities。　　Therefore；　as　portrait…painters　are
  more　exact　in　their　lines　and　features　of　the　face　and　the
  expression　of　the　eyes；　in　which　the　character　is　seen；　without
  troubling　themselves　about　the　other　parts　of　the　body；　so　I　must
  be　allowed　to　give　my　more　particular　attention　to　the　signs　and
  indications　of　the　souls　of　men；　and　while　I　endeavour　by　these
  means　to　portray　their　lives；　I　leave　important　events　and　great
  battles　to　be　described　by　others。〃
  Things　apparently　trifling　may　stand　for　much　in　biography　as　well
  as　history；　and　slight　circumstances　may　influence　great　results。
  Pascal　has　remarked；　that　if　Cleopatra's　nose　had　been　shorter；
  the　whole　face　of　the　world　would　probably　have　been　changed。　　But
  for　the　amours　of　Pepin　the　Fat；　the　Saracens　might　have　overrun
  Europe；　as　it　was　his　illegitimate　son；　Charles　Martel；　who
  overthrew　them　at　Tours；　and　eventually　drove　them　out　of　France。
  That　Sir　Walter　Scott　should　have　sprained　his　foot　in　running
  round　the　room　when　a　child；　may　seem　unworthy　of　notice　in　his
  biography；　yet　'Ivanhoe；'　'Old　Mortality；'　and　all　the　Waverley
  novels　depended　upon　it。　　When　his　son　intimated　a　desire　to　enter
  the　army；　Scott　wrote　to　Southey；　〃I　have　no　title　to　combat　a
  choice　which　would　have　been　my　own；　had　not　my　lameness
  prevented。〃　　So　that；　had　not　Scott　been　lame；　he　might　have
  fought　all　through　the　Peninsular　War；　and　had　his　breast　covered
  with　medals；　but　we　should　probably　have　had　none　of　those　works
  of　his　which　have　made　his　name　immortal；　and　shed　so　much　glory
  upon　his　country。　　Talleyrand　also　was　kept　out　of　the　army；　for
  which　he　had　been　destined；　by　his　lameness；　but　directing　his
  attention　to　the　study　of　books；　and　eventually　of　men；　he　at
  length　took　rank　amongst　the　greatest　diplomatists　of　his　time。
  Byron's　clubfoot　had　probably　not　a　little　to　do　with　determining
  his　destiny　as　a　poet。　　Had　not　his　mind　been　embittered　and　made
  morbid　by　his　deformity；　he　might　never　have　written　a　linehe
  might　have　been　the　noblest　fop　of　his　day。　　But　his　misshapen
  foot　stimulated　his　mind；　roused　his　ardour；　threw　him　upon　his
  own　resourcesand　we　know　with　what　result。
  So；　too；　of　Scarron；　to　whose　hunchback　we　probably　owe　his
  cynical　verse；　and　of　Pope；　whose　satire　was　in　a　measure　the
  outcome　of　his　deformityfor　he　was；　as　Johnson　described　him；
  〃protuberant　behind　and　before。〃　　What　Lord　Bacon　said　of
  deformity　is　doubtless；　to　a　great　extent；　true。　　〃Whoever；〃
  said　he；　〃hath　anything　fixed　in　his　person　that　doth　induce
  contempt；　hath　also　a　perpetual　spur　in　himself　to　rescue
  and　deliver　himself　from　scorn；　therefore；　all　deformed　persons
  are　extremely　bold。〃
  As　in　portraiture；　so　in　biography；　there　must　be　light　and　shade。
  The　portrait…painter　does　not　pose　his　sitter　so　as　to　bring　out
  his　deformities；　nor　does　the　biographer　give　undue　prominence　to
  the　defects　of　the　character　he　portrays。　　Not　many　men　are　so
  outspoken　as　Cromwell　was　when　he　sat　to　Cooper　for　his　miniature：
  〃Paint　me　as　I　am；〃　said　he；　〃warts　and　all。〃　　Yet；　if　we　would
  have　a　faithful　likeness　of　faces　and　characters；　they　must　be
  painted　as　they　are。　　〃Biography；〃　said　Sir　Walter　Scott；　〃the
  most　interesting　of　every　species　of　composition；　loses　all　its
  interest　with　me　when　the　shades　and　lights　of　the　principal
  characters　are　not　accurately　and　faithfully　detailed。　　I　can　no
  more　sympathise　with　a　mere　eulogist；　than　I　can　with　a　ranting
  hero　on　the　stage。〃　（7）
  Addison　liked　to　know　as　much　as　possible　about　the　person　and
  character　of　his　authors；　inasmuch　as　it　increased　the　pleasure
  and　satisfaction　which　he　derived　from　the　perusal　of　their　books。
  What　was　their　history；　their　experience；　their　temper　and
  disposition？　　Did　their　lives　resemble　their　books？　　They　thought
  noblydid　they　act　nobly？　　〃Should　we　not　delight；〃　says　Sir
  Egerton　Brydges；　〃to　have　the　frank　story　of　the　lives　and
  feelings　of　Wordsworth；　Southey；　Coleridge；　Campbell；　Rogers；
  Moore；　and　Wilson；　related　by　themselves？with　whom　they　lived
  early；　how　their　bent　took　a　decided　course；　their　likes　and
  dislikes；　their　difficulties　and　obstacles；　their　tastes；　their
  passions；　the　rocks　they　were　conscious　of　having　split　upon；
  their　regrets；　their　complacencies；　and　their　self…
  justifications？〃　（8）
  When　Mason　was　reproached　for　publishing　the　private　letters　of
  Gray；　he　answered；　〃Would　you　always　have　my　friends　appear　in
  full…dress？〃　　Johnson　was　of　opinion　that　to　write　a　man's　life
  truly；　it　is　necessary　that　the　biographer　should　have　personally
  known　him。　　But　this　condition　has　been　wanting　in　some　of　the
  best　writers　of　biographies　extant。　（9）　　In　the　case　of　Lord
  Campbell；　his　personal　intimacy　with　Lords　Lyndhurst　and　Brougham
  seems　to　have　been　a　positive　disadvantage；　leading　him　to　dwarf
  the　excellences　and　to　magnify　the　blots　in　their　characters。
  Again；　Johnson　says：　〃If　a　man　profess　to　write　a　life；　he　must
  write　it　really　as　it　was。　　A　man's　peculiarities；　and　even　his
  vices；　should　be　mentioned；　because　they　mark　his　character。〃　　But
  there　is　always　this　difficulty；that　while　minute　details　of
  conduct；　favourable　or　otherwise；　can　best　be　given　from　personal
  knowledge；　they　cannot　always　be　published；　out　of　regard　for　the
  living；　and　when　the　time　arrives　when　they　may　at　length　be　told；
  they　are　then　no　longer　remembered。　　Johnson　himself　expressed
  this　reluctance　to　tell　all　he　knew　of　those　poets　who　had　been
  his　contemporaries；　saying　that　he　felt　as　if　〃walking　upon　ashes
  under　which　the　fire　was　not　extinguished。〃
  For　this　reason；　amongst　others；　we　rarely　obtain　an　unvarnished
  picture　of　character　from　the　near　relatives　of　distinguished　men；
  and；　interesting　though　all　autobiography　is；　still　less　can　we
  expect　it　from　the　men　themselves。　　In　writing　his　own　memoirs；　a
  man　will　not　tell　all　that　he　knows　about　himself。　　Augustine　was
  a　rare　exception；　but　few　there　are　who　will；　as　he　did　in　his
  'Confessions；'　lay　bare　their　innate　viciousness；　deceitfulness；
  and　selfishness。　　There　is　a　Highland　proverb　which　says；　that　if
  the　best　man's　faults　were　written　on　his　forehead　he　would　pull
  his　bonnet　over　his　brow。　　〃There　is　no　man；〃　said　Voltaire；　〃who
  has　not　something　hateful　in　himno　man　who　has　not　some　of　the
  wild　beast　in　him。　　But　there　are　few　who　will　honestly　tell　us
  how　they　manage　their　wild　beast。〃　　Rousseau　pretended　to　unbosom
  himself　in　his　'Confessions；'　but　it　is　manifest　that　he　held　back
  far　more　than　he　revealed。　　Even　Chamfort；　one　of　the　last　men　to
  fear　what　his　contemporaries　might　think　or　say　of　him；　once
  observed：…　〃It　seems　to　me　impossible；　in　the　actual　state　of
  society；　for　any　man　to　exhibit　his　secret　heart；　the　details　of
  his　character　as　known　to　himself；　and；　above　all；　his　weaknesses
  and　his　vices；　to　even　his　best　friend。〃
  An　autobiography　may　be　true　so　far　as　it　goes；　but　in
  communicating　only　part　of　the　truth；　it　may　convey　an　impression
  that　is　really　false。　　It　may　be　a　disguisesometimes　it　is　an
  apologyexhibiting　not　so　much　what　a　man　really　was；　as　what　he
  would　have　liked　to　be。　　A　portrait　in　profile　may　be　correct；　but
  who　knows　whether　some　scar　on　the　off…cheek；　or　some　squint　in
  the　eye　that　is　not　seen；　might　not　have　en